【单选题】
A、She’s going to the eye doctor.
B.She’s supervising new employees.
C.She’s having her dinner in the cafeteri
A、
D.She’s looking for some help.
A、She’s going to the eye doctor.
B.She’s supervising new employees.
C.She’s having her dinner in the cafeteri
A、
D.She’s looking for some help.
【单选题】 The shop-lifter ______ without paying a dozen times.
A.admitted to take goods
B.admitted to be taking goods
C.admitted to have taken goods
D.admitted to having taken goods
A.admitted to take goods
B.admitted to be taking goods
C.admitted to have taken goods
D.admitted to having taken goods
【单选题】 According to the passage, some doctors recommend that night-shift workers should ______.
A.have frequent visits and phone calls
B.improve their family relationship
C.have two smaller sleep periods
D.rely mainly on light therapy
A.have frequent visits and phone calls
B.improve their family relationship
C.have two smaller sleep periods
D.rely mainly on light therapy
【单选题】 It's incredible that France ______ the EU Constitution.
A.rejects
B.rejected
C.has rejected
D.should have rejected
A.rejects
B.rejected
C.has rejected
D.should have rejected
【单选题】Questions 19 to 22 are based on the conversation you have just hearD、A、She thinks she has good writing skills.
B、She hopes she will have chances to improve.
C、She is not confident with her writing skills.
D、She thinks her writing skills are the best.
B、She hopes she will have chances to improve.
C、She is not confident with her writing skills.
D、She thinks her writing skills are the best.
【单选题】 The two girls had so ______in common that they soon became good friends.
A.many
B.little
C.few
D.much
A.many
B.little
C.few
D.much
【单选题】
A、on
B.through
C.with
D.of
A、on
B.through
C.with
D.of
【单选题】 If only she did not play the violin in the middle of the night, she'd been an ideal neighbour.
A.如果她不在午夜时分拉小提琴,她就会是一个理想的邻居。
B.只有当她不在午夜时分拉小提琴时,她才是一个好邻居。
C.要是她不在午夜时分拉小提琴,她就算是一个完美的邻居了。
D.尽管她不会在晚上拉小提琴,但她曾是一个理想的好邻居。
A.如果她不在午夜时分拉小提琴,她就会是一个理想的邻居。
B.只有当她不在午夜时分拉小提琴时,她才是一个好邻居。
C.要是她不在午夜时分拉小提琴,她就算是一个完美的邻居了。
D.尽管她不会在晚上拉小提琴,但她曾是一个理想的好邻居。
【单选题】Most people don’t leave their front door unlocked, and the same is true of their home Wi-Fi networks.But some believe that preventing access to your wireless Internet actually does more harm than gooD、PeterEckersley of theElectronic Frontier Foundation, an organisation devoted to defending digital rights, is calling for an "Open Wireless Movement" and encouraging people to be "socially responsible" by sharing their connection.
Eckersley compares the current situation of locked-down networks to "finding yourself parched (干透的) and thirsty while everyone around you is sipping from nice tall glasses of iced water", and offers a technological solution. We restrict access to our networks for two reasons: to prevent other people from using up our bandwidth, and to ensure our security and privacy.
He suggests we can still protect ourselves from both problems by using routers (路由器) that share a certain amount of bandwidth in the open while also providing an encrypted (加密的) connection for personal use, but such technology already exists, and people aren’t choosing to use it.
Perhaps the problem is not technological, but legal, as home users don’t want to be responsible for the activities of others on their network. Quite understandable, really.ButEckersley says that "individuals can enjoy the same legal protections against liability as any other Internet access provider", but the law is far from clear in this area and differs from country to country.
In a footnote on his article,Eckersley says US law "may" offer protection, but that didn’t prevent a man who left his network open from being called a paedophile (恋童癖者) by armed police in his living room this past weekenD、Courts in Germany have previously ruled that people can be fined if they allow unauthorised users to access illegal materials through their connection, while in the UK disputes over recent changes to the law leave the matter uncertain.
Perhaps these legal concerns can be overcome by turning to an unlikely role-model—Estonia, where access to the Internet is a legal human right. The country is blanketed in a network of free Wi-Fi access points in cafés, bars and other public locations, allowing people to easily get online almost anywhere.
So who wants to open up their network first
What can be inferred fromEckersley’s words "individuals ... Internet access provider" (Lines 3-4, ParA、4)
A.Laws protect home users of Internet from responsibilities.
B.Internet access providers take no responsibility for their users’ illegal activities.
C.Home users enjoy the same rights as Internet access providers.
D.It is Internet access providers who should be responsible for their users’ activities.
Eckersley compares the current situation of locked-down networks to "finding yourself parched (干透的) and thirsty while everyone around you is sipping from nice tall glasses of iced water", and offers a technological solution. We restrict access to our networks for two reasons: to prevent other people from using up our bandwidth, and to ensure our security and privacy.
He suggests we can still protect ourselves from both problems by using routers (路由器) that share a certain amount of bandwidth in the open while also providing an encrypted (加密的) connection for personal use, but such technology already exists, and people aren’t choosing to use it.
Perhaps the problem is not technological, but legal, as home users don’t want to be responsible for the activities of others on their network. Quite understandable, really.ButEckersley says that "individuals can enjoy the same legal protections against liability as any other Internet access provider", but the law is far from clear in this area and differs from country to country.
In a footnote on his article,Eckersley says US law "may" offer protection, but that didn’t prevent a man who left his network open from being called a paedophile (恋童癖者) by armed police in his living room this past weekenD、Courts in Germany have previously ruled that people can be fined if they allow unauthorised users to access illegal materials through their connection, while in the UK disputes over recent changes to the law leave the matter uncertain.
Perhaps these legal concerns can be overcome by turning to an unlikely role-model—Estonia, where access to the Internet is a legal human right. The country is blanketed in a network of free Wi-Fi access points in cafés, bars and other public locations, allowing people to easily get online almost anywhere.
So who wants to open up their network first
What can be inferred fromEckersley’s words "individuals ... Internet access provider" (Lines 3-4, ParA、4)
A.Laws protect home users of Internet from responsibilities.
B.Internet access providers take no responsibility for their users’ illegal activities.
C.Home users enjoy the same rights as Internet access providers.
D.It is Internet access providers who should be responsible for their users’ activities.
【单选题】 According to the author, the distinction between violent acts and nonviolent ones in sports is______.
A.impossible to make
B.not very clear in any circumstances
C.too obvious to escape observation
D.not very difficult to make if enough attention is paid to
A.impossible to make
B.not very clear in any circumstances
C.too obvious to escape observation
D.not very difficult to make if enough attention is paid to
发布评论 查看全部评论