| GMAT考试易错题（2019/2/19） |
| 第1题：Read the statement and the instructions that follow it, and then make any notes that will help you plan your response. Write your response on a separate sheet of paper. If possible, type your essay on a word processor. Because of research priorities at the national and academic levels, we know more about the surface of the moon than we do about the ocean floor of our own planet, despite the central role the oceans play in global transportation, food production, and climate. It would be more sensible to reallocate those resources dedicated to space research to the exploration of our oceans. Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion stated above. Support your views with reasons and/or examples from your own experiences, observations, or reading. |
| 【分析题】： |
| 第2题：One day a car rental agency rented 2/3 of its cars, including 3/5 of its cars withC D、players. If 3/4 of its cars haveC D、players, what percent of the cars that were not rented hadC D、players A、10% B、35% C、45% D、66.7% E、90% |
| 【单选题】： |
| 第3题：For any 3 given numbers, which of the following is always equivalent to adding the 3 numbers together and then dividing the sum by 3 Ⅰ. Ordering the 3 numbers numerically, from highest to lowest, and then selecting the middle number. Ⅱ.Dividing each of the numbers by 3 and then adding the results together. Ⅲ. Multiplying each number by 6, adding the resulting products together, and then dividing the sum by 9. A、Ⅰ only B、Ⅱ only C、Ⅰ and Ⅱ only D、Ⅱ and Ⅲ only E、None of the above |
| 【单选题】： |
| 第4题：The questions in this group are based on the content of a passage.After reading the passage, choose the best answer to each question.Answer all questions following the passage on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage. The collapse of the stock "bubble" of Internet-related companies in 2000-2001 has resulted in more than its fair share of analysis, hand-wringing, and finger-pointing.A、panel discussion at a recent Technology Today conference in Santa Monica produced a heated debate between two former luminaries of the dot.corn world: investment banker Pat Verhofen and Sue Mickelson, founder andCEO of Internet retailer Frizbeez.com. Verhofen fired the opening shot by placing blame for the collapse of Internet stocks on the shoulders of Internet entrepreneurs who aggressively promoted ideas without viable business models. These entrepreneurs were both irresponsible and deceptive, Verhofen argued, to take investors’ money to fund operations that could not reasonably turn a profit, such as giving computers away for free or selling bulky objects, such as dog food or furniture, over the Internet. Many of these companies, he suggested, were little more than arrangements of smoke and mirrors designed to separate investors from their money. Mickelson responded that Verhofen was like a fox in a henhouse blaming the rooster for all the dead chickens.Entrepreneurs cannot be blamed, she argued, for trying to make money for themselves and other people, because that is what entrepreneurs do. She also stated that you cannot know what ideas will or will not work until you try them; contemporaries of the Wright brothers said that a heavier-than-air aircraft could never work, and look at the skies today. Mickelson instead placed the blame on the unscrupulous bankers and fund managers who hyped Internet stocks in order to cash in on fees from IPOs and trades. In contrast to entrepreneurs, these financial types actually do have a responsibility to offer only sound financial advice to their clients. If anyone should bear the blame, she argued, it should be people like Pat Verhofen. Indigo Smith, the moderator of the panel, responded that perhaps the true fault lay with the common investors, who should not have invested in technology stocks in the first place if they lacked the knowledge to do so properly. While she expressed sympathy for those elderly investors who lost substantial portions of their retirement savings on flimsy Internet stocks, she observed that no one forced them to invest in those stocks. Which of the following best describes the structure of the passage A、It mentions a puzzling situation, and then describes three approaches people have taken to help understand that situation. B、It presents an argument for why something took place, and then offers a refutation of that argument. C、It introduces a past phenomenon and then presents three explanations for why the phenomenon took place. D、It describes a problem, offers a solution to the problem, and then offers reasons why the solution could not work. E、It offers three explanations for a phenomenon and then summarizes what all three have in common. |
| 【单选题】： |
| 第5题： A、city councilman has proposed a controversial new plan to increase city revenues from the parking places downtown. He has proposed that instead of charging $1.20 per hour for parking in these spots, the city should make all parking spots five-minute loading zones, and then assess $15 parking fines on anyone who parks in the spots for more than five minutes. Which of the following, if true, provides the strongest argument that the councilman’s plan will not increase the city’s revenue A、 A、system that promotes parking fines will anger citizens, and they will consequently vote the councilman out of office if the plan goes through. B、The city owns only 14 parking spots in the downtown are A、 C、The costs of assessing and collecting the parking fines will surpass the revenues likely to be collected from the new plan. D、Ray’s parking garage, the only competition for the city-owned parking places downtown, charges $18 per day for its parking places. E、It has been observed that on an average day, approximately three different cars park in each of the city-owned parking spots downtown. |
| 【单选题】： |