【单选题】Nothing more unlucky, I sometimes think,
  could have befallenChaucer than that he should
  have been christened "the father ofEnglish
 Line poetry." For "father" in such a context conveys to
(5) most of us, I fear, a faint suggestion of vicarious
glory—the derivative celebrity of parents, other-
wise obscure, who shine, moon-like, in the
reflected luster of their sons. What else than
progenitors were the fathers of Plato, orCaesar,
(10) or Shakespeare, or NapoleonAnd so to call
  Chaucer the father ofEnglish poetry is often tan-
 tamount to dismissing him, not unkindly, as the
 estimable but archaic ancestor of a brilliant line.
  ButChaucer—if I may risk the paradox—is him-
(15) self the very thing he begat. He isEnglish poetry
 incarnate, and only two, perhaps, of all his sons
 outshine his fame. It is withChaucer himself,
 then, and not save incidentally with his ancestral
 eminence that we shall be concerneD、
(20)But five hundred and thirty-three years have
 passed sinceChaucer dieD、And to overleap five
 centuries is to find ourselves in another world, a
 world at once familiar and strange. Its determin-
 ing concepts are implicit in all thatChaucer, who
(25) was of it, thought and wrote.And, woven as they
 are into his web, they at once lend to it and gain
 from it flesh significance. To us they are obso-
 lete; in theCanterbury Tales, and the Troilus, and
 the House of Fame they are current and alive.
(30)And it is in their habit as they lived, and not as
 mere curious lore, that I mean to deal with them.
   Let me begin with the very tongue which
  Chaucer spoke—a speech at once our own and
 not our own. "You know," he wrote—and for the
(35) moment I rudely modernize lines as liquid in their
 rhythm as smooth-sliding brandy—"you know
 that in a thousand years there is change in the
 forms of speech, and words which were then
 judged apt and choice now seem to us wondrous
(40) quaint and strange, and yet they spoke them so,
 and managed as well in love with them as men
 now do."And to us, after only half a thousand
 years, those very lines are an embodiment of what
 they state:
(45)   Ye knowe eek, that in forme of speche is
   chaunge
   Withinne a thousand yeer, and words tho
   That hadden prys, now wonder nyce and
   straunge
(50)Us thinketh hem; and yet they spake hem so,
 And spedde as wel in love as men now do.
 But it is not onlyChaucer’s speech which has
undergone transformation. The change in his
world is greater still.And the situation which
(55) confronts us is this. InChancer’s greatest work
 we have to do with timeless creations upon a
 time-determined stage.And it is one of the
 inescapable ironies of time that creations of the
 imagination which are at once of no time and for
(60) all time must nevertheless think and speak and act
 in terms and in ways which are as transient as
 they themselves are permanent. Their world—the
 stage on which they play their parts, and in terms
 of which they think—has become within a few
(65) lifetimes strange and obsolete, and must be deci-
 phered before it can be reaD、For the immortal
 puts on mortality when great conceptions are
 clothed in the only garment ever possible—in
 terms whose import and associations are fixed by
(70) the form and pressure of an in
网考网参考答案:E
网考网解析:
暂无解析
                 
				 
                	document.getElementById("warp").style.display="none";
                	document.getElementById("content").style.display="block";
                 
                查看试题解析出处>>
							
	          			
发布评论 查看全部评论