【单选题】 rAChEl hollAnD BEliEvEs pArEnts Don't tEACh mAny things to thEir ChilDrEn BECAusE thEy
A.
B.
C.
A.
A. hAvE so littlE timE. |
B.
B. Don't know how to Do suCh things. |
C.
C. hAvEn't BEEn wEll EDuCAtED. |
【分析解答题】
A、FrEE wEights ArEA
B、lADiEs’ ChAnging ArEA
C、mEn’s ChAnging ArEA
D、rEFrEshmEnt ArEA
E、trEADmills
F vArious mAChinEs
A、FrEE wEights ArEA
B、lADiEs’ ChAnging ArEA
C、mEn’s ChAnging ArEA
D、rEFrEshmEnt ArEA
E、trEADmills
F vArious mAChinEs
【分析解答题】The advantages of ’’an after the act’’ operation is:(31)____________(32)____________(33)_____________easilyOnly (34)____________of large firms and (35) _____________of small firms have a standard raw material inspection procedure.This testing of a product’’s effect must assess the impact of both ( 36 ) ____________and (37) ____________.
【分析解答题】
whAt DoEs thE writEr think shoulD BE CArriED out in A CompAny BEForE it stArts rECyCling
whAt DoEs thE writEr think shoulD BE CArriED out in A CompAny BEForE it stArts rECyCling
【分析解答题】
ACCorDing to thE tExt, {{B}}FivE{{/B}} oF thE Following stAtEmEnts ArE truE. writE thE CorrEsponDing lEttErs in AnswEr BoxEs 18 to 22 in Any orDEr.
A、gErmAny hAs thE highEst pErCEntAgE oF ChilDlEss womEn.
B、itAly AnD polAnD hAvE high Birth rAtEs.
C、most oF thE rEAsons givEn By miChAEl tEitElBAum ArE not uniquE to gErmAny.
D、Communist govErnmEnts inEuropE EnCourAgED pEoplE to hAvE ChilDrEn.
E、in 1979, most FAmiliEs hAD onE or two ChilDrEn.
FEuropEAn womEn who hAvE A ChilD lAtEr usuAlly hAvE morE soon AFtEr.
g in 2001, pEoplE wAntED FEwEr ChilDrEn thAn in 1979, ACCorDing toEuroBAromEtEr rEsEArCh.
h hErE mAy BE A nAturAl lEvEl At whiCh Birth rAtEs stop DEClining.
ACCorDing to thE tExt, {{B}}FivE{{/B}} oF thE Following stAtEmEnts ArE truE. writE thE CorrEsponDing lEttErs in AnswEr BoxEs 18 to 22 in Any orDEr.
A、gErmAny hAs thE highEst pErCEntAgE oF ChilDlEss womEn.
B、itAly AnD polAnD hAvE high Birth rAtEs.
C、most oF thE rEAsons givEn By miChAEl tEitElBAum ArE not uniquE to gErmAny.
D、Communist govErnmEnts inEuropE EnCourAgED pEoplE to hAvE ChilDrEn.
E、in 1979, most FAmiliEs hAD onE or two ChilDrEn.
FEuropEAn womEn who hAvE A ChilD lAtEr usuAlly hAvE morE soon AFtEr.
g in 2001, pEoplE wAntED FEwEr ChilDrEn thAn in 1979, ACCorDing toEuroBAromEtEr rEsEArCh.
h hErE mAy BE A nAturAl lEvEl At whiCh Birth rAtEs stop DEClining.
【分析解答题】
ACCorDing to thE tExt, {{B}}FivE{{/B}} oF thE Following stAtEmEnts ArE truE. writE thE CorrEsponDing lEttErs in AnswEr BoxEs 18 to 22 in Any orDEr.
A、gErmAny hAs thE highEst pErCEntAgE oF ChilDlEss womEn.
B、itAly AnD polAnD hAvE high Birth rAtEs.
C、most oF thE rEAsons givEn By miChAEl tEitElBAum ArE not uniquE to gErmAny.
D、Communist govErnmEnts inEuropE EnCourAgED pEoplE to hAvE ChilDrEn.
E、in 1979, most FAmiliEs hAD onE or two ChilDrEn.
FEuropEAn womEn who hAvE A ChilD lAtEr usuAlly hAvE morE soon AFtEr.
g in 2001, pEoplE wAntED FEwEr ChilDrEn thAn in 1979, ACCorDing toEuroBAromEtEr rEsEArCh.
h hErE mAy BE A nAturAl lEvEl At whiCh Birth rAtEs stop DEClining.
ACCorDing to thE tExt, {{B}}FivE{{/B}} oF thE Following stAtEmEnts ArE truE. writE thE CorrEsponDing lEttErs in AnswEr BoxEs 18 to 22 in Any orDEr.
A、gErmAny hAs thE highEst pErCEntAgE oF ChilDlEss womEn.
B、itAly AnD polAnD hAvE high Birth rAtEs.
C、most oF thE rEAsons givEn By miChAEl tEitElBAum ArE not uniquE to gErmAny.
D、Communist govErnmEnts inEuropE EnCourAgED pEoplE to hAvE ChilDrEn.
E、in 1979, most FAmiliEs hAD onE or two ChilDrEn.
FEuropEAn womEn who hAvE A ChilD lAtEr usuAlly hAvE morE soon AFtEr.
g in 2001, pEoplE wAntED FEwEr ChilDrEn thAn in 1979, ACCorDing toEuroBAromEtEr rEsEArCh.
h hErE mAy BE A nAturAl lEvEl At whiCh Birth rAtEs stop DEClining.
【分析解答题】Vietnam has become one of the fastest-growing countries inAsiaIf foreign investment is anything to go by, the nominally communist rulers of Vietnam have made their peace with capitalism. The country raked in foreign direct investment worth more than 8% of GDP last year, even more, proportionally, thanChin
A、After its oversized and overheating neighbors, Vietnam also boastsAsia’’s best-performing economy. It has grown by an average of 7.4% a year over the past decade and is likely to achieve a similar figure this year.Better yet, the boom has lifted many Vietnamese out of poverty.As recently as 1993, the WorldBank considered 58% of the population poor.By 2002, that had fallen to 29%.Can Vietnam maintain this remarkable momentum So far, its economy has proved unstoppable. Neither last year’’s outbreak of SARS, a respiratory disease which scared away tourists, nor this year’’s avian flu epidemic, which hurt poultry farmers, made much of a dent.Even during theAsian financial crisis of the late 1990s, when other countries in the region were plunged into recession, growth in Vietnam never fell below 4.8%. At first, agricultural reform, which redistributed land from the state to poor farmers, propelled the boom. More recently, export growth, fuelled by cheap, efficient labour and burgeoning foreign investment, has driven the economy.Exports leapt 20% last year.AsDoDueDinh, a local economist, points out, the money Vietnam earns from this trade — roughly $ 20 billion last year—now dwarfs the $ 2 billion — odd it gets each year in hand-outs from foreign donors. Vietnam’’s exports toAmerica doubled in 2002, after the two countries signed a trade pact, and again in 2003. Admittedly, as trade withAmerica grows, it has become more controversial. Last year,American catfish farmers, by invoking arcane anti-dumping laws, persuaded their government to impose steep tariffs on imports of Vietnamese catfish. NowAmerican shrimp-fishermen are trying to repeat the same trick.American bureaucrats are also contemplating reducing the amount of garments Vietnam can export toAmerica, as a penalty for allowingChinese-made clothes to enterAmerica on Vietnam’’s quot
A、Even if Vietnam is let off the hook, the quota will from now on only grow by a few percentage points a year.Between 2001 and 2003, by contrast, textile exports to the United States grew from $ 47 million to $2.4 billion. But Vietnam’’s diversified exports — it produces commodities, agricultural goods and manufactures — provide insulation against fluctuations in any single product. Its markets are diverse, too, although catfish exports toAmerica fell by a third after the new tariffs were imposed, overall exports of catfish grew, as Vietnamese exporters found new customers inEurope andAustrali
A、Vietnam also hopes to join the World Trade Organisation next year.But even if this deadline slips, it still has its trade pact withAmerica, its membership ofAFTA, a South-EastAsian free-trade area, and its proximity toChin
A、Small businesses have also boomed, since the government passed a new law in 2000 making it easier to set them up.By the end of 2002, over 50,000 new companies had sprung up.But as Martin Rama of the WorldBank points out, Vietnam has almost no middling private firms between these mom-and-pop ventures and big exporters backed by foreign investors.Such businesses find it hard to grow because they cannot readily get access to land or capital.About half of bank lending goes to state-owned enterprises, although that share is falling. What is more, even if banks (mostly state-owned themselves) wanted to lend to entrepreneurs, the latter have little collateral to pledge for their loans. In Vietnam, the state owns all the land and grants land-use rights to farmers, businesses and home-owners.Although these are theoretically transferable, banks are fearful that Vietnam’’s antiquated courts would not enforce their rights. Such f
A、After its oversized and overheating neighbors, Vietnam also boastsAsia’’s best-performing economy. It has grown by an average of 7.4% a year over the past decade and is likely to achieve a similar figure this year.Better yet, the boom has lifted many Vietnamese out of poverty.As recently as 1993, the WorldBank considered 58% of the population poor.By 2002, that had fallen to 29%.Can Vietnam maintain this remarkable momentum So far, its economy has proved unstoppable. Neither last year’’s outbreak of SARS, a respiratory disease which scared away tourists, nor this year’’s avian flu epidemic, which hurt poultry farmers, made much of a dent.Even during theAsian financial crisis of the late 1990s, when other countries in the region were plunged into recession, growth in Vietnam never fell below 4.8%. At first, agricultural reform, which redistributed land from the state to poor farmers, propelled the boom. More recently, export growth, fuelled by cheap, efficient labour and burgeoning foreign investment, has driven the economy.Exports leapt 20% last year.AsDoDueDinh, a local economist, points out, the money Vietnam earns from this trade — roughly $ 20 billion last year—now dwarfs the $ 2 billion — odd it gets each year in hand-outs from foreign donors. Vietnam’’s exports toAmerica doubled in 2002, after the two countries signed a trade pact, and again in 2003. Admittedly, as trade withAmerica grows, it has become more controversial. Last year,American catfish farmers, by invoking arcane anti-dumping laws, persuaded their government to impose steep tariffs on imports of Vietnamese catfish. NowAmerican shrimp-fishermen are trying to repeat the same trick.American bureaucrats are also contemplating reducing the amount of garments Vietnam can export toAmerica, as a penalty for allowingChinese-made clothes to enterAmerica on Vietnam’’s quot
A、Even if Vietnam is let off the hook, the quota will from now on only grow by a few percentage points a year.Between 2001 and 2003, by contrast, textile exports to the United States grew from $ 47 million to $2.4 billion. But Vietnam’’s diversified exports — it produces commodities, agricultural goods and manufactures — provide insulation against fluctuations in any single product. Its markets are diverse, too, although catfish exports toAmerica fell by a third after the new tariffs were imposed, overall exports of catfish grew, as Vietnamese exporters found new customers inEurope andAustrali
A、Vietnam also hopes to join the World Trade Organisation next year.But even if this deadline slips, it still has its trade pact withAmerica, its membership ofAFTA, a South-EastAsian free-trade area, and its proximity toChin
A、Small businesses have also boomed, since the government passed a new law in 2000 making it easier to set them up.By the end of 2002, over 50,000 new companies had sprung up.But as Martin Rama of the WorldBank points out, Vietnam has almost no middling private firms between these mom-and-pop ventures and big exporters backed by foreign investors.Such businesses find it hard to grow because they cannot readily get access to land or capital.About half of bank lending goes to state-owned enterprises, although that share is falling. What is more, even if banks (mostly state-owned themselves) wanted to lend to entrepreneurs, the latter have little collateral to pledge for their loans. In Vietnam, the state owns all the land and grants land-use rights to farmers, businesses and home-owners.Although these are theoretically transferable, banks are fearful that Vietnam’’s antiquated courts would not enforce their rights. Such f
【分析解答题】Rights to remember NEW HN,CONNECTICUTOne element of this doctrine is what I call "Achilles and his heel". September 11th brought uponAmerica, as once uponAchilles, a schizophrenic sense of both exceptional power and exceptional vulnerability. Never has a superpower seemed so powerful and so vulnerable at the same time. TheBush doctrine asked: "How can we use our superpower resources to protect our vulnerability "The administration has also radically shifted its emphasis on human rights. In 1941, FranklinDelano Roosevelt called the allies to arms by painting a vision of the world we were trying to make: a post-war world of four fundamental freedoms: freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom from want, freedom from fear.This framework foreshadowed the post-war human-rights construct-embedded in the UniversalDeclaration of Human Rights and subsequent international covenants that emphasised comprehensive protection of civil and political rights (freedom of speech and religion), economic, social and cultural rights (freedom from want), and freedom from gross violations and persecution (the RefugeeConvention, the GenocideConvention and the TortureConvention).ButBush administration officials have now reprioritised "freedom from fear" as the number-one freedom we need to preserve. Freedom from fear has become the obsessive watchword ofAmerica’’s human-rights policy.Witness five faces of a human-rights policy fixated on freedom from fear.
A、 Two core tenets of a post-Watergate world had been that our government does not spy on its citizens, and thatAmerican citizens should see what our government is doing.But since September 11th, classification of government documents has risen to new heights.The PatriotAct, passed almost without dissent after September 11th, authorises theDefenceDepartment to develop a project to promote something called "total information awareness". Under this programme, the government may gather huge amounts of information about citizens without proving they have done anything wrong. They can access a citizen’’s records-whether telephone, financial, rental, internet, medical, educational or library-without showing any involvement with terrorism. Internet service providers may be forced to produce records based solely on FBI declarations that the information is for an anti-terrorism investigation.Many absurdities follow: the LawyersCommittee for Human Rights, in a study published in September, reports that 20American peace activists, including nuns and high-school students, were recently flagged as security threats and detained for saying that they were travelling to a rally to protest against military aid toColombi
A、The entire high-school wrestling team of Juneau,Alaska, was held up at airports seven times just because one member was the son of a retiredCoast Guard officer on the FBI watch-list.
B、After September 11th, 1,200 immigrants were detained, more than 750 on charges based solely on civil immigration violations. The JusticeDepartment’’s own inspector — general called the attorney — general’’s enforcement of immigration laws "indiscriminate and haphazard". The Immigration and Naturalisation Service, which formerly had a mandate for humanitarian relief as well as for border protection, has been converted into an arm of theDepartment of Homeland Security.The impact on particular groups has been devastating. The number of refugees resettled inAmerica declined from 90,000 a year before September 11th to less than a third that number, 27,000, this year. The Pakistani population ofAtlanticCounty, New Jersey has fallen by half. C、 Some 660 prisoners from 42 countries are being held in GuantanamoBay, some for nearly two years. Three children are apparently being detained, including a 13-year-old, several of the detainees are aged over 70, and one claims to be over 100.Courtrooms are being b
A、 Two core tenets of a post-Watergate world had been that our government does not spy on its citizens, and thatAmerican citizens should see what our government is doing.But since September 11th, classification of government documents has risen to new heights.The PatriotAct, passed almost without dissent after September 11th, authorises theDefenceDepartment to develop a project to promote something called "total information awareness". Under this programme, the government may gather huge amounts of information about citizens without proving they have done anything wrong. They can access a citizen’’s records-whether telephone, financial, rental, internet, medical, educational or library-without showing any involvement with terrorism. Internet service providers may be forced to produce records based solely on FBI declarations that the information is for an anti-terrorism investigation.Many absurdities follow: the LawyersCommittee for Human Rights, in a study published in September, reports that 20American peace activists, including nuns and high-school students, were recently flagged as security threats and detained for saying that they were travelling to a rally to protest against military aid toColombi
A、The entire high-school wrestling team of Juneau,Alaska, was held up at airports seven times just because one member was the son of a retiredCoast Guard officer on the FBI watch-list.
B、After September 11th, 1,200 immigrants were detained, more than 750 on charges based solely on civil immigration violations. The JusticeDepartment’’s own inspector — general called the attorney — general’’s enforcement of immigration laws "indiscriminate and haphazard". The Immigration and Naturalisation Service, which formerly had a mandate for humanitarian relief as well as for border protection, has been converted into an arm of theDepartment of Homeland Security.The impact on particular groups has been devastating. The number of refugees resettled inAmerica declined from 90,000 a year before September 11th to less than a third that number, 27,000, this year. The Pakistani population ofAtlanticCounty, New Jersey has fallen by half. C、 Some 660 prisoners from 42 countries are being held in GuantanamoBay, some for nearly two years. Three children are apparently being detained, including a 13-year-old, several of the detainees are aged over 70, and one claims to be over 100.Courtrooms are being b
【分析解答题】Applying for your student loan can take up to (11)_______________ to process, you can specify whether you wish to receive the (12) _______________, or to give you (13) ______________, one each term.If you think you are likely to spend too much money in the first term, you should seriously consider the payment in (14) ____________.Most banks now offer (15) ____________of up to a few hundred pounds to all students.
【分析解答题】Don’’t laugh at gilded butterfliesPart
A、 The Gillette company’’s website flashes out a message to the e-visitor: "Innovation is Gillette", it claims. There are few big companies that would not like to make a similar claim; for they think innovation is a bit likeBotox — inject it in the right corporate places and improvements are bound to follow.But too many companies want one massive injection, one huge blockbuster, to last them for the foreseeable future. Unfortunately, successful innovation is rarely like that.The latest manifestation of Gillette’’s innovative skill will appear in stores in NorthAmerica next month. The global leader in men’’s "grooming products" is rolling out a successor to its popular three-bladed Mach3 range. It will not, as comedians had long anticipated, be a four-bladed version. Rather, it will be the world’’s first vibrating "wet shave" blade. The battery-powered M3Power is designed to bounce around on your skin to give "a smoother, more comfortable shave".For a company that claims to embody innovation, this is less than earth-shattering. On the innovation scale it falls closer toBrooksBrothers’’ new stain-proof tie than to the video-cassette recorder or the digital camera—especially since there is a suspicion that Gillette may be keener to create synergy between its razor and its batteries division than it is to usher in a genuinely new male-grooming experience. Even in relatively zippy businesses like pharmaceuticals, genuinely new products are fewer and further between. Spending on pharmaceutical R&D、has doubled over the past decade, but the number of new drugs approved each year byAmerica’’s Food andDrugAdministration has halveD、Drug companies still live in the hope of finding a big winner that will keep their shareholders happy for a long time.But this focus means that many unglamorous, but potentially interesting, compounds may be bottled up in their laboratories.Part
B、 WilliamBaumol, a professor at New York University, argues that big companies have been learning important lessons from the history of innovation.Consider, for example, that in general they have both cut back and redirected their R&D、spending in recent years. Gone are the droves of white-coated scientists surrounded by managers in suits anxiously awaiting the next cry of "eureka". Microsoft is a rare exception, one of the few big companies still spending big bucks on employing top scientists in the way pioneered by firms such asAT&T (with itsBell Laboratories) and Xerox.This will prove to be a wise investment by Microsoft only if its scientists’’ output can be turned into profitable products or services.AT&T and Xerox, when in their heyday, managed to invent the transistor and the computer mouse; but they never made a penny out of them. Indeed, says Mr.Baumol, the record shows that small companies have dominated the introduction of new inventions and radical innovations — independent inventors come up with most of tomorrow’’s clever gizmos, often creating their own commercial ventures in the process. But big companies have shifted their efforts. Mr.Baumol reckons they have been forced by competition to focus on innovation as part of normal corporate activity. Rather than trying to make money from science, companies have turned R&D、into an "internal, bureaucratically driven process". Innovation by big companies has become a matter of incremental improvements within the processes that constitute daily operations.Pharmaceutical giants continue to get their hands on new science by buying small innovative firms, particularly in biotech. Toby Stuart, a professor at theColumbiaBusiness School in New York, thinks that this shows another change in the supply chain of invention. He says that many of the biotech firms are merely intermediating between the universities and "Big Pharma", the distributors and marketers of the fruits of academia’’s invention. Universities used to license
A、 The Gillette company’’s website flashes out a message to the e-visitor: "Innovation is Gillette", it claims. There are few big companies that would not like to make a similar claim; for they think innovation is a bit likeBotox — inject it in the right corporate places and improvements are bound to follow.But too many companies want one massive injection, one huge blockbuster, to last them for the foreseeable future. Unfortunately, successful innovation is rarely like that.The latest manifestation of Gillette’’s innovative skill will appear in stores in NorthAmerica next month. The global leader in men’’s "grooming products" is rolling out a successor to its popular three-bladed Mach3 range. It will not, as comedians had long anticipated, be a four-bladed version. Rather, it will be the world’’s first vibrating "wet shave" blade. The battery-powered M3Power is designed to bounce around on your skin to give "a smoother, more comfortable shave".For a company that claims to embody innovation, this is less than earth-shattering. On the innovation scale it falls closer toBrooksBrothers’’ new stain-proof tie than to the video-cassette recorder or the digital camera—especially since there is a suspicion that Gillette may be keener to create synergy between its razor and its batteries division than it is to usher in a genuinely new male-grooming experience. Even in relatively zippy businesses like pharmaceuticals, genuinely new products are fewer and further between. Spending on pharmaceutical R&D、has doubled over the past decade, but the number of new drugs approved each year byAmerica’’s Food andDrugAdministration has halveD、Drug companies still live in the hope of finding a big winner that will keep their shareholders happy for a long time.But this focus means that many unglamorous, but potentially interesting, compounds may be bottled up in their laboratories.Part
B、 WilliamBaumol, a professor at New York University, argues that big companies have been learning important lessons from the history of innovation.Consider, for example, that in general they have both cut back and redirected their R&D、spending in recent years. Gone are the droves of white-coated scientists surrounded by managers in suits anxiously awaiting the next cry of "eureka". Microsoft is a rare exception, one of the few big companies still spending big bucks on employing top scientists in the way pioneered by firms such asAT&T (with itsBell Laboratories) and Xerox.This will prove to be a wise investment by Microsoft only if its scientists’’ output can be turned into profitable products or services.AT&T and Xerox, when in their heyday, managed to invent the transistor and the computer mouse; but they never made a penny out of them. Indeed, says Mr.Baumol, the record shows that small companies have dominated the introduction of new inventions and radical innovations — independent inventors come up with most of tomorrow’’s clever gizmos, often creating their own commercial ventures in the process. But big companies have shifted their efforts. Mr.Baumol reckons they have been forced by competition to focus on innovation as part of normal corporate activity. Rather than trying to make money from science, companies have turned R&D、into an "internal, bureaucratically driven process". Innovation by big companies has become a matter of incremental improvements within the processes that constitute daily operations.Pharmaceutical giants continue to get their hands on new science by buying small innovative firms, particularly in biotech. Toby Stuart, a professor at theColumbiaBusiness School in New York, thinks that this shows another change in the supply chain of invention. He says that many of the biotech firms are merely intermediating between the universities and "Big Pharma", the distributors and marketers of the fruits of academia’’s invention. Universities used to license
发布评论 查看全部评论