【单选题】Themillionsofcalculationsinvolved，byhand，wouldhavelostallpracticalvaluebythetimetheywerefinished.（）
A.hadtheybeendone
B.theyhadbeendone
C.havingbeendone
D.theyweredone
A.hadtheybeendone
B.theyhadbeendone
C.havingbeendone
D.theyweredone
【分析解答题】（原 文）
I agree to some extent with my imaginary English reader. American literary historians are perhaps prone to view their own national scene too narrowly, mistaking prominence for uniqueness. They do over-phrase their own literature, or certainly its minor figures. And Americans do swing from aggressive overphrase of their literature to an equally unfortunate, imitative deference. But then, the English themselves are somewhat insular in their literary appraisals. Moreover, in fields where they are not pre-eminent - e. g. in painting and music -they too alternate between boasting of native products and copying those of the Continent. How many English paintings try to look as though they were done in Paris; how many times have we read in articles that they really represent an "English tradition" after all.
To speak of American literature, then, is not to assert that it is completely unlike that of Europe. Broadly speaking, America and Europe have kept step. At any given moment the traveler could find examples in both of the same architecture, the same styles in dress, the same books on the shelves. Ideas have crossed the Atlantic as freely as men and merchandise, though sometimes more slowly. When I refer to American habit, thoughts, etc., I intend some sort of qualification to precede the word, for frequently the difference between America and Europe (especially England) will be one of degree, sometimes only of a small degree. The amount of divergence is a subtle affair, liable to perplex the Englishman when he looks at America. He is looking at a country which in important senses grew out of his own, which in several ways still resembles his own - and which is yet a foreign country. There are odd overlappings and abrupt unfamiliarities; kinship yields to a sudden alienation, as when we hail a person across the street, only to discover from his blank response that we have mistaken a stranger for a friend.
I agree to some extent with my imaginary English reader. American literary historians are perhaps prone to view their own national scene too narrowly, mistaking prominence for uniqueness. They do over-phrase their own literature, or certainly its minor figures. And Americans do swing from aggressive overphrase of their literature to an equally unfortunate, imitative deference. But then, the English themselves are somewhat insular in their literary appraisals. Moreover, in fields where they are not pre-eminent - e. g. in painting and music -they too alternate between boasting of native products and copying those of the Continent. How many English paintings try to look as though they were done in Paris; how many times have we read in articles that they really represent an "English tradition" after all.
To speak of American literature, then, is not to assert that it is completely unlike that of Europe. Broadly speaking, America and Europe have kept step. At any given moment the traveler could find examples in both of the same architecture, the same styles in dress, the same books on the shelves. Ideas have crossed the Atlantic as freely as men and merchandise, though sometimes more slowly. When I refer to American habit, thoughts, etc., I intend some sort of qualification to precede the word, for frequently the difference between America and Europe (especially England) will be one of degree, sometimes only of a small degree. The amount of divergence is a subtle affair, liable to perplex the Englishman when he looks at America. He is looking at a country which in important senses grew out of his own, which in several ways still resembles his own - and which is yet a foreign country. There are odd overlappings and abrupt unfamiliarities; kinship yields to a sudden alienation, as when we hail a person across the street, only to discover from his blank response that we have mistaken a stranger for a friend.
【单选题】why DoEs thE mAn wAnt to tAkE A ClAss At thE Community CollEgE
A．its CoursEs Cost lEss.
B．it hAs A pool.
C．thE ClAss sizE is smAllEr.
D．it mAy oFFEr thE ClAss hE nEEDs During thE DAy.
A．its CoursEs Cost lEss.
B．it hAs A pool.
C．thE ClAss sizE is smAllEr.
D．it mAy oFFEr thE ClAss hE nEEDs During thE DAy.
【单选题】whAt hAs AChiEvED AFtEr mr. powEll mEt with isrAEli primE ministEr AriEl shAron AnD with pAlEstiniAn lEADEr yAssEr ArAFAt
A．isrAElis AnD pAlEstiniAns will CArry out thE mitChEll plAn.
B．isrAElis AnD pAlEstiniAns will CEAsE-FirE soon.
C．isrAElis AnD pAlEstiniAns AgrEE to A sEvEn-DAy tEst pErioD For thE CurrEnt CEAsE-FirE, BEForE Any FurthEr stEps ArE tAkEn.
D．nothing.
A．isrAElis AnD pAlEstiniAns will CArry out thE mitChEll plAn.
B．isrAElis AnD pAlEstiniAns will CEAsE-FirE soon.
C．isrAElis AnD pAlEstiniAns AgrEE to A sEvEn-DAy tEst pErioD For thE CurrEnt CEAsE-FirE, BEForE Any FurthEr stEps ArE tAkEn.
D．nothing.
【单选题】whiCh oF thE Following stAtEmEnts is truE
A．thE miCrosoFt will BE BrokEn up into sEpArAtE CompAniEs.
B．A lowEr Court orDEr thAt thE giAnt us ComputEr soFtwArE CompAny miCrosoFt not BE BrokEn up into sEpArAtE CompAniEs.
C．A FEDErAl AppEAls Court orDEr thAt thE giAnt us ComputEr soFtwArE CompAny miCrosoFt BE BrokEn up into sEpArAtE CompAniEs.
D．A FEDErAl AppEAls Court hAs ovErturnED A lowEr Court orDEr thAt thE giAnt us ComputEr soFtwArE CompAny miCrosoFt not BE BrokEn up into sEpArAtE CompAniEs.
A．thE miCrosoFt will BE BrokEn up into sEpArAtE CompAniEs.
B．A lowEr Court orDEr thAt thE giAnt us ComputEr soFtwArE CompAny miCrosoFt not BE BrokEn up into sEpArAtE CompAniEs.
C．A FEDErAl AppEAls Court orDEr thAt thE giAnt us ComputEr soFtwArE CompAny miCrosoFt BE BrokEn up into sEpArAtE CompAniEs.
D．A FEDErAl AppEAls Court hAs ovErturnED A lowEr Court orDEr thAt thE giAnt us ComputEr soFtwArE CompAny miCrosoFt not BE BrokEn up into sEpArAtE CompAniEs.
【单选题】
A．Fish
B．Fishing
C．FishEs
D．FishEr
A．Fish
B．Fishing
C．FishEs
D．FishEr
【单选题】quEstions 14 to 17 ArE BAsED on thE Following pAssAgE.At thE EnD oF thE pAssAgE, you will BE givEn 20 sEConDs to AnswEr thE quEstions.
now listEn to thE pAssAgE.
whAt is thE rEsponsiBility oF thE suBEDitors in thE nEwspApEr oFFiCEA．ChECk AnD prEpArE thE Copy For thE printEr.
B．sEE thAt EvErything runs smoothly.
C．mAkE DECisions ABout whAt goEs into thE nEwspApEr.
D．hAvE ClosE ContACt with thE housE oFCommons AnD thE politiCAl ContEnt.
now listEn to thE pAssAgE.
whAt is thE rEsponsiBility oF thE suBEDitors in thE nEwspApEr oFFiCEA．ChECk AnD prEpArE thE Copy For thE printEr.
B．sEE thAt EvErything runs smoothly.
C．mAkE DECisions ABout whAt goEs into thE nEwspApEr.
D．hAvE ClosE ContACt with thE housE oFCommons AnD thE politiCAl ContEnt.
【单选题】whAt ArE thE two stuDEnts tAlking ABout
A．thE DEvElopmEnt oF thE CoFFEE inDustry.
B．thE CoFFEE-growing trADition in jAmAiCA.
C．somE intErEsting FACts ABout CoFFEE.
D．thE EConomiC importAnCE oF CoFFEE.
A．thE DEvElopmEnt oF thE CoFFEE inDustry.
B．thE CoFFEE-growing trADition in jAmAiCA.
C．somE intErEsting FACts ABout CoFFEE.
D．thE EConomiC importAnCE oF CoFFEE.
【单选题】whAt CAn BE inFErrED From thE nEws
A．ivory trADing is prohiBitED in spAin.
B．most oF thE sEizED ivory is not lEgAlly Bought.
C．thE ivory CAmE From 400 AFriCAn ElEphAnts.
D．thE workshop ownEr wAs CAught smuggling.
A．ivory trADing is prohiBitED in spAin.
B．most oF thE sEizED ivory is not lEgAlly Bought.
C．thE ivory CAmE From 400 AFriCAn ElEphAnts.
D．thE workshop ownEr wAs CAught smuggling.
【单选题】iF thErE wErE 100 million pEoplE logging on to thE intErnEt in 1997, how mAny pEoplE loggED on thE intErnEt in 1995
A．10 million.
B．25 million.
C．50 million.
D．75 million.
A．10 million.
B．25 million.
C．50 million.
D．75 million.
发布评论 查看全部评论