考博习题练习

考博易错题(2019/1/14)
1题:
86. {{U}}Contemporary technological reporting is full of notions of electronic communities in which people interact across regions or entire continents.{{/U}}Could such "virtual communities" eventually replace geographically localized social relations There are reasons to suspect that, as the foundation for a democratic society, virtual communities will remain seriously deficient.
87. {{U}}For example, electronic communication filters out and alters much of the subtlety, warmth, contextuality, and so on that seem important to fully human, morally engaged interaction.{{/U}} That is one reason many Japanese andEuropean executives persist in considering face-to-face encounter essential to their business dealings and why many engineers, too, prefer face-to-face encounter and find it essential to their creativity.
88. {{U}}Even hypothetical new media (e. g. advanced "virtual realities"), conveying a dimensionally richer sensory display are unlikely to prove fully satisfactory, substitutes for face-to-face interaction.{{/U}}Electronic media decompose holistic experience into analytically distinct sensory dimensions and then transmit the latter.At the receiving end, people can resynthesize the resulting parts into a coherent experience, but the new whole is invariably different and, in some fundamental sense, less than the original.
Second, there is evidence that screen-based technologies (such as TV and computer monitors) are prone to induce democratically unpromising psychopathologies, ranging from escapism to passivity, obsession, confusing watching with doing, withdrawal from other forms of social engagement, or distancing from moral consequences.
Third, a strength--but also a drawback--to a virtual community is that any member can exit instantly. Indeed, an entire virtual community can decline or perish in the wink of an eye.
89. {{U}}To the extent that membership in virtual communities proves less stable than that obtaining in other forms of democratic community, or that social relations prove less thick (i. e. less embedded in a context filled with shared meaning and history), there could be adverse consequences for individual psychological and moral development.{{/U}}
90. {{U}}no matter with whom we communicate or how far our imaginations fly, our bodies--and hence many material interdependencies with other people--always remain locally situateD、{{/U}} Thus it seems morally hazardous to commune with far-flung tele-mates, if that means growing indifferent to physical neighbors. It is not encouraging to observe just such indifference inCalifornia’s Silicon Valley, one of the world’s most "highly wired" regions.
【分析题】:
2题:The bill would establish protection against—and criminal and ______ penalties for—the improper disclosure of protected patient information.
A.domestic
B.homely
C.internal
D.civil
【单选题】:      

3题: Because of a recent obstacle in production, sales have dropped and accordingly profits have ______.
A.declined
B.increased
C.broken
D.maintained
【单选题】:      

4题: This man is ______ to wine.
A.addicted
B.predicted
C.dictated
D.evicted
【单选题】:      

5题:Cooperative competition.Competitive cooperation.ConfusedAirline alliances have travelers scratching their heads over what’ s going on in the skies. Some folks view alliances as a blessing to travelers, offering seamless travel, reduced fares and enhanced frequent-flyer benefits. Others see a conspiracy of big business, causing decreased competition, increased fares and fewer choices. Whatever your opinion, there’ s no escaping airline alliances: the marketing hype is unrelenting, with each of the two mega-groupings. One world and StarAlliance, promoting itself as the best choice for all travelers.And, even if you turn away from their ads, chances are they will figure in any of your travel plans.By the end of the year, one world and StarAlliance will between them control more than 40% of the traffic in the sky. Some pundits predict that figure will be more like 75% in 10 years.
But why, after years of often ferocious competition, have airlines decided to band together Let’ s just say the timing is mutually convenient. NorthAmerican airlines, having exhausted all means of earning customer loyalty at home, have been looking for ways to reach out to foreign flyers.Asian carriers are still burring from the region-wide economic downturn that began two years ago— just when some of the airlines were taking delivery of new aircraft.Alliances also allow carriers to cut costs and increase profits by pooling manpower resources on the ground ( rather than each airline maintaining its own ground crew) and code-sharing--the practice of two partners selling tickets and operating only one aircraft.
So alliances are terrific for airlines, but are they good for the passengerAbsolutely, say the airlines: think to the lounges, the joint FFP (frequent flyer programme) benefits, the round-the- world fares, and the global service networks. Then there’ s the promise of "seamless" travel: the ability to, say, travel form Singapore to Rome to New York to Rio de Janiero, all on one ticket, without having to wait hours for connections or worry about your bags. Sounds utopian PeterBuecking,Cathay Pacific’ s director of sales and marketing, thinks that seamless travel is still evolving. "It’s fair to say that these links are only in their infancy. The key to seamlessness rests in infrastructure and information sharing. We’ re working on this." Henry Ma, spokesperson for StarAlliance in Hong Kong, lists stone of the other benefits for consumers: "Global travelers have an easier time making connections and planning their itineraries." Ma claims alliances also assure passengers consistent service standards.
Critics of alliances say the much-touted benefits to the consumer are mostly pie in the sky, that alliances are all about reducing costs for the airlines, rationalizing services and running joint marketing programmes. JeffBlyskal, associate editor ofConsumer Reports magazine, says the promotional ballyhoo over alliances is much ado about nothing. "I don’ t see much of a gain for consumers: alliances are just a marketing gimmick.And as far as seamless travel goes, I’ II believe it when I see it. Most airlines can ’ t even get their own connections under control, let alone coordinate with another airline."
Blyskal believes alliances will ultimately result in decreased flight choices and increased costs for consumers. Instead of two airlines competing and each operating a flight on the same route at 70% capacity, the allied pair will share the route and ran one full flight. Since fewer seats will be available, passengers will be obliged to pay more for tickets.
The truth about alliances and their merits probably lies somewhere between the travel utopia presented by the players and the evil empires portrayed by their critics.And how much they affect you depends on what kind of traveler you are.
Those who have already made the elite grade in the FFP of a major airline stand to bene
【单选题】:      

 

您正在结束答题

请确认是否提交试卷?

继续做题 确认提交