| 考博易错题（2019/4/2） |
第1题：
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| 【分析题】： |
| 第2题： What's the best summary for this passage A．New educational theories will revolutionize the way our children learn. B．The influence of new methodology will spread worldwide. C．Personal values like self-esteem will become predominant for school children in the future. D．Current education trends may jeopardize the prospects of future, generations. |
| 【单选题】： |
| 第3题：The Renaissance embraced, first of all, an impressive record of new achievements in art, literature, science, philosophy, education and religion.Although die foundation of many of these was classical, they soon expanded beyond the measure of Greek and Roman influence. Indeed, many of the achievements in painting, science, politics and religion bore little relation to the classical heritage. Secondly, the Renaissance incorporated a number of dominant ideas and attitudes that gave it the impress of a unique society. Notable among these in general were optimism, and individualism; but the most significant of them all was humanism. In its broadest meaning humanism may be defined as emphasis on the human values. It was a term derived fromCicero, who used it in the sense of devotion to the liberal arts, or the subjects most compatible with the dignity of man. The humanists rejected the Scholastic philosophy with its preoccupation with theology and logiC、They strove for a smooth and elegant style that would appeal more to the aesthetic than to the rational side of man’s nature. |
| 【分析题】： |
| 第4题：I’d ______ his reputation with other farmers and business people in the community, and then make a decision about whether or not to approve a loan. A、take into account B、account for C、make up for D、make out |
| 【单选题】： |
| 第5题：Pundits who want to sound judicious are fond of warning against generalizing.Each country is different, they say, and no one story fits all ofAsi A、This is, of course, silly, all of these economies plunged into economic crisis within a few months of each other, so they must have had something in common. In fact, the logic of catastrophe was pretty much the same in Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia and South Kore A、(Japan is a very different story. ) In each case investors—mainly, but not entirely, foreign banks who had made short-term loans—all tried to pull their money out at the same time. The result was a combined banking and currency crisis, a banking crisis because no bank can convert all its assets into cash on short notice; a currency crisis because panicked investors were trying not only to convert long-term assets into cash, but to convert baht or rupiah into dollars. In the face of the stampede, governments had no good options. If they let their currencies plunge, inflation would soar and companies that had borrowed in dollars would go bankrupt; if they tried to support their currencies by pushing up interest rates, the same firms would probably go bust from the combination of debt burden and recession. In practice, countries split the difference and paid a heavy price regardless. Was the crisis a punishment for bad economic management Like most cliches, the catchphrase "crony capitalism" has prospered because it gets at something real; excessively cozy relationships between government and business really did lead to a lot of bad investments. The still primitive financial structure ofAsian business also made the economies peculiarly vulnerable to a loss of confidence.But the punishment was surely disproportionate to the crime, and many investments that look foolish in retrospect seemed sensible at the time. Given that there were no good policy options, was the policy response mainly on the right track There was frantic blame-shifting when everything inAsia seemed to be going wrong; now there is a race to claim credit when some things have started to go right. The International Monetary Fund points to Korea’s recovery—and more generally to the fact that the sky didn’t fall after all—as proof that its policy recommendations were right, never mind that other IMF clients have done far worse, and that the economy of Malaysia—which refused IMF help, and horrified respectable opinion by imposing capital controls—also seems to be on the menD、Malaysia’s Prime Minister, by contrast, claims full credit for any good news—even though neighboring economies also seem to have bottomed out. The truth is that an observer without any ax to grind would probably conclude that none of the polices adopted either on or in defiance of the IMF’s advice made much difference either way.Budget polices, interest rate policies, banking reform— whatever countries tried, just about all the capital that could flee, diD、And when there was no more money to run, the natural recuperative powers of the economies finally began to prevail.At best, the money doctors who purported to offer cures provided a helpful bedside manner; at worse, they were like medieval physicians who prescribed bleeding as a remedy for all ills. Will the patients stage a full recovery It depends on exactly what you mean by "full". South Korea’s industrial production is already above its pre-crisis level, but in the spring of 1997 anyone who had predicted zero growth in Korean industry over the next two years would have been regarded as a reckless doomsayer. So if by recovery you mean not just a return to growth, but one that brings the region’s performance back to something like what people used to regard as theAsian norm, they have a long way to go. The "observer without any ax to grind" in the fifth paragraph means ______. A、observer without any tools to use B、observer without target C、ob |
| 【单选题】： |