【单选题】诸湿肿满，皆属于
A．肾
B．肺
C．脾
D．肝
A．肾
B．肺
C．脾
D．肝
【单选题】下列各项，属三焦生理功能的是
A．受纳腐熟
B．运化水谷
C．受盛化物
D．通行元气
A．受纳腐熟
B．运化水谷
C．受盛化物
D．通行元气
【单选题】中国共产党做出《关于民主的联合战线的决议案》的会议是( )
A．中共“一大”
B．中共“二大”
C．中共“三大”
D．中共“四大”
A．中共“一大”
B．中共“二大”
C．中共“三大”
D．中共“四大”
【单选题】下列各项，具有泌别清浊功能的是
A．脾
B．胃
C．小肠
D．膀胱
A．脾
B．胃
C．小肠
D．膀胱
【单选题】 The returns in the short ______ may be small, but over a number of years the investment will be well repaid.
A．interval
B．range
C．span
D．term
A．interval
B．range
C．span
D．term
【单选题】胃癌来源于
A．腺颈部的干细胞
B．表面黏液细胞
C．壁细胞
D．主细胞
A．腺颈部的干细胞
B．表面黏液细胞
C．壁细胞
D．主细胞
【单选题】Fate has not been kind to the western grey whale. Its numbers have dwindled to 130 or so, leaving it “critically endangered” in the eyes of the International Union for theConservation of Nature. Fishing-nets, speeding ships, pollution and coastal development threaten the few that remain. Most recently, drilling for oil and gas in their main summer feeding grounds, near Sakhalin island off Russia’s Pacific coast, has brought fresh risks for the luckless creatures. Yet the rush to develop Sakhalin’s offshore fields may yet be the saviour of the species.
When drilling was first discussed in the 1990s, there were muted complaints. When a consortium called Sakhalin.Energy, led by RoyalDutch Shell, announced plans to build an oil platform and lay pipelines in the only bay where the whales were known to congregate, these protests proliferateD、
In response, the consortium established an independent panel to advise it on how best to protect the whales and promised to fund its work. It subsequently agreed to change the route of the pipeline at the panel’s suggestion, although it refused to move the platform, as other critics had demandeD、It also agreed either to follow the panel’s recommendations in future or to explain publicly why it was rejecting them.
The platforms and pipelines are now complete. SakhalinEnergy exported its first cargo of liquefied natural gas last week. The project, says Shell, is an engineering triumph and a commercial success despite all the controversy.
But has it been a success for the whales SakhalinEnergy says their number seems to be growing by 2.5% a year, although IanCraig, the firm’s boss, admits that the cause might be greater scrutiny rather than population growth. The scientists on the panel still seem worrieD、They complain that the firm has not always provided the information they need to assess the threat to the whales. It also has not always followed advice, the scientists’ advice about how noisy construction might scare the animals away, for example, or the speed that boats should travel to minimize the risk of hitting the whales. The scientists warn that the loss of just a few fertile females would be enough to tip the population into irrevocable decline. Last summer, there seemed to be far fewer whales around than normal.
On the other hand, the panel knows this only because SakhalinEnergy funds lots of research on the whales.As a result, it has discovered that they have a wider range than originally thought, which might explain why so few of them showed up off Sakhalin island last year.
Therefore, it is hard to escape the conclusion that, for creatures with a lot as sorry as the western grey whale, a nearby oil project is something of a blessing.
Why are Sakhalin’s offshore oil and gas projects regarded as risks for the western grey whaleA．Because they instantly endanger the animal’s summer habitat.
Because drilling for oil and gas may cause new pollution to the seA、
C．Because they need more ships which are dangers to the animal.
D．Because offshore development may result in more harm.
When drilling was first discussed in the 1990s, there were muted complaints. When a consortium called Sakhalin.Energy, led by RoyalDutch Shell, announced plans to build an oil platform and lay pipelines in the only bay where the whales were known to congregate, these protests proliferateD、
In response, the consortium established an independent panel to advise it on how best to protect the whales and promised to fund its work. It subsequently agreed to change the route of the pipeline at the panel’s suggestion, although it refused to move the platform, as other critics had demandeD、It also agreed either to follow the panel’s recommendations in future or to explain publicly why it was rejecting them.
The platforms and pipelines are now complete. SakhalinEnergy exported its first cargo of liquefied natural gas last week. The project, says Shell, is an engineering triumph and a commercial success despite all the controversy.
But has it been a success for the whales SakhalinEnergy says their number seems to be growing by 2.5% a year, although IanCraig, the firm’s boss, admits that the cause might be greater scrutiny rather than population growth. The scientists on the panel still seem worrieD、They complain that the firm has not always provided the information they need to assess the threat to the whales. It also has not always followed advice, the scientists’ advice about how noisy construction might scare the animals away, for example, or the speed that boats should travel to minimize the risk of hitting the whales. The scientists warn that the loss of just a few fertile females would be enough to tip the population into irrevocable decline. Last summer, there seemed to be far fewer whales around than normal.
On the other hand, the panel knows this only because SakhalinEnergy funds lots of research on the whales.As a result, it has discovered that they have a wider range than originally thought, which might explain why so few of them showed up off Sakhalin island last year.
Therefore, it is hard to escape the conclusion that, for creatures with a lot as sorry as the western grey whale, a nearby oil project is something of a blessing.
Why are Sakhalin’s offshore oil and gas projects regarded as risks for the western grey whaleA．Because they instantly endanger the animal’s summer habitat.
Because drilling for oil and gas may cause new pollution to the seA、
C．Because they need more ships which are dangers to the animal.
D．Because offshore development may result in more harm.
【分析解答题】Text 3
European farm ministers have ended three weeks of negotiations with a deal which they claim represents genuine reform of the common agricultural policyCAP). Will it be enough to kickstart theDoha world trade negotiations?
On the face of it, the deal agreed in the early hours of Thursday June 26th looks promising. Most subsidies linked to specific farm products are, at last, to be broken—the idea is to replace these with a direct payment to farmers, unconnected to particular products. Support prices for several key products, including milk and butter, are to be cut—that should meanEuropean prices eventually falling towards the world market level.Cutting the link between subsidy and production was the main objective of proposals put forward by Mr Fischler, which had formed the starting point for the negotiations.
TheCAP is hugely unpopular around the worl
D、It subsidisesEuropean farmers to such an extent that they can undercut farmers from poor countries, who also face trade barriers that largely exclude them from the potentially lucrativeEuropean market. Farm trade is also a key feature of theDoha round of trade talks, launched under the auspices of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) in November 2001.Developing countries have lined up alongside a number of industrial countries to demand an end to the massive subsidiesEurope pays its farmers. SeveralDoha deadlines have already been missed because of theEU’s intransigence, and the survival of the talks will be at risk if no progress is made by September, when the world's trade ministers meet inCancùn, Mexico.
But now even the French seem to have gone along with the deal hammered out in Luxembourg. Up to a point, anyway. The package of measures gives the green light for the most eager reformers to move fast to implement the changes within their own countries.But there is an escape clause of sorts for the French and other reform-averse nations. They can delay implementation for up to two years. There is also a suggestion that the reforms might not apply where there is a chance that they would lead to a reduction in land under cultivation.
These let-outs are potentially damaging forEurope’s negotiators in theDoha roun
D、They could significantly reduce the cost savings that the reforms might otherwise generate and, in turn, keepEuropean expenditure on farm support unacceptably high by world standards. More generally, the escape clauses could undermine the reforms by encouraging the suspicion that the new package will not deliver the changes that its supporters claim.Close analysis of what is inevitably a very complicated package might confirm the sceptics' fears.
31. The deal agreed on Thursday looks promising in that _____.
[A]European farm ministers finally reached a consensus
[B] the link between farm products and subsidies is removed
[C] farmers would definitely accept the direct payment to them
[D]European farm products will reach a lower price level than the world
32. It can be inferred from the third paragraph that ____.
[A] farmers from poor countries were put at a disadvantage byCAP
[B] the deal will be a key subject of debate inDoha round of trade talks
[C] the deal was probably a result of pressure from other countries
[D] the world’s trade ministers will resist the new deal reached recently
33. In what case might the escape clauses apply in reform-averse nations ?
[A] Farmers lose their interest in farming.
[B] Reforms have to be delayed for up to two years.
[C] Implementation of the measures goes too eagerly.
[D] The measures damage the reformers’ confidence.
34. The new package of measures is inevitably a complicated one due to ____.
[A]Europe’s negotiators’ loss of confidence
[B]European expenditure on farm support
[C] escape clauses for someEuropean countries
[D] suspicion of the new package
35. What is the passage mainly about ?
[A] a promising new deal
[B]Doha world trade negotiations
[C] world’s anger againstEurope
[D] doomed reforms ofCAP
European farm ministers have ended three weeks of negotiations with a deal which they claim represents genuine reform of the common agricultural policyCAP). Will it be enough to kickstart theDoha world trade negotiations?
On the face of it, the deal agreed in the early hours of Thursday June 26th looks promising. Most subsidies linked to specific farm products are, at last, to be broken—the idea is to replace these with a direct payment to farmers, unconnected to particular products. Support prices for several key products, including milk and butter, are to be cut—that should meanEuropean prices eventually falling towards the world market level.Cutting the link between subsidy and production was the main objective of proposals put forward by Mr Fischler, which had formed the starting point for the negotiations.
TheCAP is hugely unpopular around the worl
D、It subsidisesEuropean farmers to such an extent that they can undercut farmers from poor countries, who also face trade barriers that largely exclude them from the potentially lucrativeEuropean market. Farm trade is also a key feature of theDoha round of trade talks, launched under the auspices of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) in November 2001.Developing countries have lined up alongside a number of industrial countries to demand an end to the massive subsidiesEurope pays its farmers. SeveralDoha deadlines have already been missed because of theEU’s intransigence, and the survival of the talks will be at risk if no progress is made by September, when the world's trade ministers meet inCancùn, Mexico.
But now even the French seem to have gone along with the deal hammered out in Luxembourg. Up to a point, anyway. The package of measures gives the green light for the most eager reformers to move fast to implement the changes within their own countries.But there is an escape clause of sorts for the French and other reform-averse nations. They can delay implementation for up to two years. There is also a suggestion that the reforms might not apply where there is a chance that they would lead to a reduction in land under cultivation.
These let-outs are potentially damaging forEurope’s negotiators in theDoha roun
D、They could significantly reduce the cost savings that the reforms might otherwise generate and, in turn, keepEuropean expenditure on farm support unacceptably high by world standards. More generally, the escape clauses could undermine the reforms by encouraging the suspicion that the new package will not deliver the changes that its supporters claim.Close analysis of what is inevitably a very complicated package might confirm the sceptics' fears.
31. The deal agreed on Thursday looks promising in that _____.
[A]European farm ministers finally reached a consensus
[B] the link between farm products and subsidies is removed
[C] farmers would definitely accept the direct payment to them
[D]European farm products will reach a lower price level than the world
32. It can be inferred from the third paragraph that ____.
[A] farmers from poor countries were put at a disadvantage byCAP
[B] the deal will be a key subject of debate inDoha round of trade talks
[C] the deal was probably a result of pressure from other countries
[D] the world’s trade ministers will resist the new deal reached recently
33. In what case might the escape clauses apply in reform-averse nations ?
[A] Farmers lose their interest in farming.
[B] Reforms have to be delayed for up to two years.
[C] Implementation of the measures goes too eagerly.
[D] The measures damage the reformers’ confidence.
34. The new package of measures is inevitably a complicated one due to ____.
[A]Europe’s negotiators’ loss of confidence
[B]European expenditure on farm support
[C] escape clauses for someEuropean countries
[D] suspicion of the new package
35. What is the passage mainly about ?
[A] a promising new deal
[B]Doha world trade negotiations
[C] world’s anger againstEurope
[D] doomed reforms ofCAP
【分析解答题】社会是由个人组成的，社会发展离不开人的发展，因此，个人主义是个人发展的动力，也必然是社会发展的动力。
【分析解答题】{{B}}Directions:{{/B}} You made a travel with a travel agency a few days ago and you were disappointed with its service. Write a letter to the related department to: 1) complain about their bad service; 2) prompt your suggestions. You should write about 100 words onANSWER SHEET 2.Do not sign your own name at the end of the letter. Use "Li Ming" insteaD、You do not need to write the address.
发布评论 查看全部评论