| MBA易错题（2019/3/15） |
| 第1题： A、major reason for conflict in the animal world is territory. The male animal {{U}} (1) {{/U}} an areA、The size of the area is sufficient to provide food for him, his {{U}} (2) {{/U}} and their offspring. Migrating birds, for example, {{U}} (3) {{/U}} up the best territory in the order of "first come, first {{U}} (4) {{/U}}." The late arrivals may acquire {{U}} (5) {{/U}} territories, but less food is available, or they are too close to the {{U}} (6) {{/U}} of the enemies of the species. {{U}} (7) {{/U}} there is really insufficient food or the danger is very great, the animal will not {{U}} (8) {{/U}}. In this way, the members of the species which are less fit will not have offspring. When there is conflict {{U}} (9) {{/U}} territory, animals will commonly use force, or a {{U}} (10) {{/U}} of force, to decide which will stay and which will go. It is interesting to note, however, that animals seem to use {{U}} (11) {{/U}} the minimum amount of force {{U}} (12) {{/U}} to drive away the intruder. There is usually no killing. In the {{U}} (13) {{/U}} of those animals which are capable of doing each other great harm, {{U}} (14) {{/U}} is a system for the losing animal to show the winning animals that he {{U}} (15) {{/U}} to submit. When he shows this, the {{U}} (16) {{/U}} normally stops fighting.Animals (especially birds), which can easily escape from conflict seem to have. {{U}} (17) {{/U}}obstacle against killing, and equally no mechanism {{U}} (18) {{/U}} submission. The losing bird simply flies away. However, if two doves are {{U}} (19) {{/U}} in a cage, and they start fighting, they will continue to fight until one kills the other. We all think of the dove as a symbol of peace and, in its natural habitat, it is peaceful.But the "peace" mechanism does not {{U}} (20) {{/U}} in a cage. |
| 第2题：One of the questions that is coming into focus as we face growing scarcity of resources of many kinds in the world is how to divide limited resources among countries. In the international development community, the conventional wisdom has been that the 2 billion people living in poor countries could never expect to reach the standard of living that most of us in NorthAmerica enjoy, simply because the world does not contain enough iron ore, protein, petroleum, and so on.At the same time, we in the United States have continued to pursue super affluence as though there were no limits on how much we could consume. We make up 6 percent of the world’s people; yet we consume one-third of the world’s resources. As long as the resources we consumed each year came primarily from within our own boundaries, this was largely an internal matter.But as our resources come more and more from the outside world, "outsiders" are going to have some say over the rate at which and terms under which we consume. We will no longer be able to think in terms of "our" resources and "their" resources, but only of common resources. AsAmericans consuming such a disproportionate share of the world’s resources, we have to question whether or not we can continue our pursuit of super affluence in a world of scarcity. We are now reaching the point where we must carefully examine’ the presumed link between our level of well-being and the level of material goods consumeD、If you have only one crust of bread and get another crust of bread, your well-being is greatly enhanceD、But if you have a loaf of bread, then an additional crust of bread doesn’t make that much difference. In the eyes of most of the world today,Americans have their loaf of bread and are asking for still more. People elsewhere are beginning to ask why. This is the question we’re going to have to answer, whether we’re trying to persuade countries to step up their exports of oil to us or trying to convince them that we ought to be permitted to maintain our share of the world fish catch. The prospect of a scarcity of, and competition for, the world’s resources requires that we reexamine the way in which we relate to the rest of the worlD、It means we find ways of cutting back on resource consumption that is dependent on the resources and cooperation of other countries. We cannot expect people in these countries to concern themselves with our worsening energy and food shortages unless we demonstrate some concern for the hunger, illiteracy and disease that are diminishing life for them. The writer gives the example of bread to show that ______. A、the United States has been much richer than any other countries B、the United States has acquired more than what it has contributed C、the United States has been too greedy in its pursuit of super affluence D、the United States is more capable of pursuing affluence than other countries |
| 【单选题】： |
| 第3题：英国石油公司在墨西哥湾的油井发生爆裂，大量原油泄漏。该公司立即并持续使用化学分散剂来分解浮油。美国众议院能源和环境委员会主席埃德·写基对化学分散剂的安全性提出了严重质疑。国家食品和药物管理局的回应是：“化学分散剂是安全的，因为没有任何报告显示这种化学品进入海产品食物链并威胁到公众的健康”。 以下哪项是对上述回应的最恰当描述 A、国家食品和药物管理局的回应是正确的。 B、国家食品和药物管理局的回应有漏洞，因为他们没有分析化学分散剂的特性，并以此为依据推出结论。 C、国家食品和药物管理局的回应有漏洞，因为他们的回应无法从根本上重塑民众对墨西哥湾食品安全的信心。 D、国家食品和药物管理局的回应有漏洞，因为他们没有找到化学分散剂不能进入海产品食物链充分的证据。 E、国家食品和药物管理局的回应有漏洞，因为他们把没有证据证明某种情况的存在，当做有充分证据证明某种情况不存在。 |
| 【单选题】： |
| 第4题：One of the questions that is coming into focus as we face growing scarcity of resources of many kinds in the world is how to divide limited resources among countries. In the international development community, the conventional wisdom has been that the 2 billion people living in poor countries could never expect to reach the standard of living that most of us in NorthAmerica enjoy, simply because the world does not contain enough iron ore, protein, petroleum, and so on.At the same time, we in the United States have continued to pursue super affluence as though there were no limits on how much we could consume. We make up 6 percent of the world’s people; yet we consume one-third of the world’s resources. As long as the resources we consumed each year came primarily from within our own boundaries, this was largely an internal matter.But as our resources come more and more from the outside world, "outsiders" are going to have some say over the rate at which and terms under which we consume. We will no longer be able to think in terms of "our" resources and "their" resources, but only of common resources. AsAmericans consuming such a disproportionate share of the world’s resources, we have to question whether or not we can continue our pursuit of super affluence in a world of scarcity. We are now reaching the point where we must carefully examine’ the presumed link between our level of well-being and the level of material goods consumeD、If you have only one crust of bread and get another crust of bread, your well-being is greatly enhanceD、But if you have a loaf of bread, then an additional crust of bread doesn’t make that much difference. In the eyes of most of the world today,Americans have their loaf of bread and are asking for still more. People elsewhere are beginning to ask why. This is the question we’re going to have to answer, whether we’re trying to persuade countries to step up their exports of oil to us or trying to convince them that we ought to be permitted to maintain our share of the world fish catch. The prospect of a scarcity of, and competition for, the world’s resources requires that we reexamine the way in which we relate to the rest of the worlD、It means we find ways of cutting back on resource consumption that is dependent on the resources and cooperation of other countries. We cannot expect people in these countries to concern themselves with our worsening energy and food shortages unless we demonstrate some concern for the hunger, illiteracy and disease that are diminishing life for them. What is the conclusion of this passage A、The United States will be isolated if it does not stop pursuing super affluence. B、The poor countries will no longer supply the United States with their goods. C、The United States should care about the well-being of other countries. D、It is time for theAmericans to help the people in poor countries to improve their living standards. |
| 【单选题】： |
| 第5题：Is the integer n a multiple of 140
(1) n is a multiple of 10. (2) n is a multiple of 14. A．条件(1)充分，但条件(2)不充分． B．条件(2)充分，但条件(1)不充分． C．条件(1)和(2)单独都不充分，但条件(1)和条件(2)联合起来充分． D．条件(1)充分，条件(2)也充分． E．条件(1)和条件(2)单独都不充分，条件(1)和条件(2)联合起来也不充分． |
| 【单选题】： |