| MBA易错题（2019/4/26） |
| 第1题：解题说明 本大题要求判断所给出的条件能否充分支持题干中陈述的结论。阅读条件(1)和条件(2)后选择： A、条件(1)充分，但条件(2)不充分 B、条件(2)充分，但条件(1)不充分 C、条件(1)和条件(2)单独都不充分，但条件(1)和条件(2)联合起来充分 D、条件(1)充分，条件(2)也充分 E、条件(1)和条件(2)单独都不充分，条件(1)和条件(2)联合起来也不充分 A公司2011年6月的产值是1月产值的(1+5a)5倍。 (1)在2011年上半年，A公司月产值的平均增长率为5a-1 (2)在2011年上半年，A公司月产值的平均增长率为5a |
| 【分析题】： |
| 第2题：在一次实验中，研究人员将大脑分为若干区域，然后扫描并比较了每个人大脑各区域的脑灰质含量。结果显示，智商测试中得分高的人与得分低的人相比，其大脑中有24个区域灰质含量更多，这些区域大都负责人的记忆、反应和语言等各种功能。 如果上述断定真，那么以下哪项一定是真的 Ⅰ．大脑中灰质越多的人，智商越高。 Ⅱ．聪明人的大脑24个区域中含有灰质。 Ⅲ．智商高的人，记忆、反应和语言能力都一定强。 A．仅仅Ⅰ B．仅仅Ⅱ C．仅仅Ⅲ D．仅仅Ⅰ和Ⅱ E．(E) Ⅰ、Ⅱ和Ⅲ |
| 【单选题】： |
| 第3题：需求量总是与价格呈相反方向变化。如果价格变化导致总收入与价格反向变化，那么需求就是有弹性的。在2007年，虽然W大学的学费降低了20%，但是W大学收到的学费总额却比2006年增加了。在这种情况下，对W大学的需求就是有弹性的。 如果以上陈述为真，以下哪项陈述一定真 A．如果价格的变化导致总收入与价格同向变化，那么需求就是有弹性的。 B．与2006年相比，学费降低20%会给W大学带来更好的经济效益。 C．如果需求是有弹性的，那么价格变化会导致总收入与价格同向变化。 D．与2006年相比，W大学在2007年招生增长的幅度超过了20%。 E．与2006年相比，W大学在2007年招生增长的幅度低于20%。 |
| 【单选题】： |
| 第4题：September 11 should have driven home a basic lesson for theBush administration about life in an interconnected world: misery abroad threatens security at home. It is no coincidence that OsamaBin Laden found warm hospitality in the Taliban’sAfghanistan, whose citizens were among the most impoverished and oppressed on earth. If the administration took this lesson seriously, it would dump the rules of realpolitik that have governed U.S. foreign aid policy for 50 years. Instead, it is pouring money into an ally of convenience, Pakistan, which is ultimately likely to expand the ranks of anti-American terrorists abroaD、 To enlist Pakistan in the fight against the Taliban, theBush administration resurrected theCold War tradition of propping up despotic military regimes in the name of peace and freedom. Its commitment of billions of dollars to Pakistan since September 11 will further entrench the sort of government that has made Pakistan both a development failure and a geopolitical hotspot for decades. Within Pakistan, the aid may ultimately create enough angry young men to make upA1 Qaeda’s losses inAfghanistan. In SouthAsia as a whole, the cash infusion may accelerate a dangerous arms race with Indi A、 Historically, the U.S. government has cloaked aid to allies such as Pakistan in the rhetoric of economic development.As aCold War ally, Pakistan received some $ 37 billion in grants and loans from the West between 1960 and 1990, adjusting for inflation.And since September 11, the U.S. administration has promised more of the’ same. It has dropped sanctions imposed after Pakistan detonated a nuclear bomb in 1998, pushed through a $1.3 billion IMF loan for Pakistan, and called for another $2 billion from the WorldBank and theAsianDevelopmentBank. TheBush administration is also, ironically, pressing allies to join it in canceling or rescheduling billions of dollars of old (and failed) loans that were granted in past decades in response to similar arm-twisting. Despite--even because of--all this aid, Pakistan is now one of the most indebted, impoverished, militarized nations on earth. The causes of Pakistan’s poverty are sadly familiar. The government ignored family planning, leading to population expansion from 50 million in 1960 to nearly 150 million today, for an average growth rate of 2.6 percent a year. Foreign aid meant to pave rural roads went into unneeded city highways--or pockets of top officials.And the military grew large, goaded by a regional rivalry with India that has three times bubbled into war. The result is a government that, as former WorldBank economist WilliamEasterly has observed, "cannot bring off a simple and cheap measles (麻疹) vaccination (预防接种) program, and yet...can build nuclear weapons.\ America supports the military regime in Pakistan in order to ______. A、control the government of Pakistan B、get the natural resources of Pakistan C、keep peace and freedom D、draw the support of Pakistan in fighting against Taliban |
| 【单选题】： |
| 第5题：When theAmerican economy was running full tilt two years ago, few places were as breathlessly delighted as Seattle. Its port was thronged with ships bringing goods fromAsi A、TheBoeingCompany could barely keep up with demand for its airliners. Microsoft was hiring hordes of software engineers.After each rain shower, another Internet millionaire sprang up. Here was a city that had it all--OldEconomy, NewEconomy, Not-Yet-InventedEconomy. Now it has all gone sour. The past 12 months have been a non-stop succession of disappointments.Boeing’s headquarters decamped toChicago. The Internet economy popped alike a balloon in a nail factory, taking with it once promising local ventures such as Homegrocer.com and leaving can’t-possibly-miss companies such as drugstore.com barely hanging on.And an already troubledBoeing was hit even harder after September 11th both by a steep drop in airliner orders and by losing a $ 200 billion Joint Strike Fighter contract to Lockheed Martin. Washington State, battered by what is happening in Seattle, now has the highest unemployment rate in the United States--6.6% compared with 5.4% in the country as a whole. Right behind it is next-door Oregon, another former boom state, with 6.5% of its workforce out of a job, the country’s second worst figure. In Oregon, manufacturing’s collapse has caused the loss of nearly 30,000 jobs in a year, those hit range from Freightliner, a maker of heavy lorries, to high-tech companies such as Intel and Fujitsu. What makes the current plunge so painful is that every part of the economy seems to have stepped into an open manhole at the same time. Three years ago, whenBoeing began to remove more than 20,000 people thatBoeing expects to lay off by the middle of 2002 have to compete with unemployed workers not just from the high-tech industry but from construction work and even the retail sector. Portland now has more jobless than the other parts of Oregon: the opposite of how things were years ago. Even worse, the Pacific north west’s downturn, as well as being deeper than the rest of the country, may also last longer. One reason for fearing this isBoeing’s continuing woes. NowadaysBoeing accounts for less than 5% of employment in the Seattle area, down from 9% two decades ago.But it remains the foundation on which the rest is built. Its network of suppliers and subcontractors gives it a far stronger multiplier effect than, say, Microsoft, which is more an island of prosperity than a center of weB、The chances are thatBoeing will not really bounce back until the assumed revival in air travel persuades airline companies to start buying plenty of aircraft again.And that may not be until 2003. What does the passage imply about "Homegrocer.com" and "drugstore.com" A、They are neither promising companies. B、They are affiliated to large companies. C、They are dealing in medical products. D、They are also affected by the economic crisis. |
| 【单选题】： |