MBA考试

【单选题】At the heart of the debate over illegal immigration lies one key question: are immigrants good or bad for the economy TheAmerican public overwhelmingly thinks they’re baD、Yet the consensus among most economists is that immigration, both legal and illegal, provides a small net boost to the economy. Immigrants provide cheap labor, lower the prices of everything from farm produce to new homes, and leave consumers with a little more money in their pockets. So why is there such a discrepancy between the perception of immigrants’ impact on the economy and the reality
There are a number of familiar theories. Some argue that people are anxious and feel threatened by an inflow of new workers. Others highlight the strain that undocumented immigrants place on public services, like schools, hospitals, and jails. Still others emphasize the role of race, arguing that foreigners add to the nation’s fears and insecurities. There’s some truth to all these explanations, but they aren’t quite sufficient.
To get a better understanding of what’s going on, consider the way immigration’s impact is felt. Though its overall effect may be positive, its costs and benefits are distributed unevenly.DavidCard, an economist at UC、Berkeley, notes that the ones who profit most directly from immigrants’ low- cost labor are businesses and employers-meatpacking plants in Nebraska, for instance, or agricultural businesses inCaliforni
A、Granted, these producers’ savings probably translate into lower prices at the grocery store, but how many consumers make that mental connection at the checkout counterAs for the drawbacks of illegal immigration, these, too, are concentrateD、Native low-skilled workers suffer most from the competition of foreign labor.According to a study by GeorgeBorjas, a Harvard economist, immigration reduced the wages ofAmerican high-school drop-outs by 9% between 1980-2000.
Among high-skilled, better-educated employees, however, opposition was strongest in states with both high numbers of immigrants and relatively generous social services. What worried them most, in other words, was the fiscal (财政的) burden of immigration. That conclusion was reinforced by another finding: that their opposition appeared to soften when that fiscal burden decreased, as occurred with welfare reform in the 1990s, which curbed immigrants’ access to certain benefits.
The irony is that for all the overexcited debate, the net effect of immigration is minimal.Even for those most acutely affected-say, low-skilled workers, orCalifornia residents-the impact isn’t all that dramatiC、"The unpleasant voices have tended to dominate our perceptions," saysDaniel Tichenor, a political science professor at the University of Oregon. "But when all those factors are put together and the economists calculate the numbers, it ends up being a net positive, but a small one." Too bad most people don’t realize it.
In what way does the author think ordinaryAmericans benefit from immigration

A、They can access all kinds of public services.
B、They can get consumer goods at lower prices.
C、They can mix with people of different cultures.
D、They can avoid doing much of the manual labor.
网考网参考答案：B
网考网解析：
[解析] 原文第3段“these producers’ savings probably translate into lower prices at the grocery store”说明移民劳动力节约了制造成本，使得美国人在小店里买的东西价格更低，这与选项B中的“goods at lower prices”对应，因此选择B。 document.getElementById("warp").style.display="none"; document.getElementById("content").style.display="block"; 查看试题解析出处>>