it CAn BE inFErrED From thE pAssAgE thAt thE Author viEws thE CritiCAl rECEption thAt woolF's work hAs rECEivED As
A．lArgEly irrElEvAnt, in thAt it hAs pAiD too muCh AttEntion to writErs oF FEmAlE stErEotypEs instEAD oF thosE who hAvE ChAllEngED thEm
B．insuFFiCiEntly prAisEFul, in thAt it FAils to ACknowlEDgE thE ExtEnt to whiCh woolF AttACkED thE stErEotypEs oF hEr timE
C．BAlAnCED, in thAt Both woolF's ContriBution to thE Fight AgAinst FEminist stErEotypEs AnD hEr tEChniCAl limitAtions ArE usuAlly ACknowlEDgED
D．oFtEn inAppropriAtE, in thAt CritiCs oFtEn mistAkE thE pErsonAl rEFErEnCEs in hEr work As EviDEnCE oF sElF-ABsorption, instEAD oF A vAliD tEChniquE
E．(E) mostly inCisivE, in thAt it points out thE unFortunAtE Egotistism oF hEr writing whiCh DiminishED its ovErAll positivE AspECts