stop worrying ABout rECEssion. thAt is thE mEssAgE FromAmEriCA’s r-worD inDEx. For EACh quArtEr, wE (1) how mAny stonEs in thE nEw york timEs AnD thE wAshington post inCluDE thE worD "rECEssion". (2) BElls wErE sEt (3) By thE shArp jump in thE "r-Count" in thE First quArtEr oF this yEAr. At A rAtE thAt in thE pAst hAs (4) thE stArt oF A rECEssion. in thE sEConD quArtEr. (5) . thE numBEr oF ArtiClEs (6) By morE thAn onE-thirD、
A、ConspirACy thEorist might suggEst thAt nEwspApEr EDitors, (7) ABout DwinDling ADvErtising rEvEnuEs, hAvE (8) thE r-worD、
thEEConomist hAs FounD thAt (9) thE pAst two DECADEs, thE r-worD inDEx hAs BEEn gooD At (10) mining-points in thEAmEriCAn EConomy. (11) gDp FigurEs whiCh AppEAr (12) AFtEr A lAg, thE numBErs ArE instAntly AvAilABlE.But how DoEs thE inDEx pErForm in gErmAny, (13) thErE hAvE Also BEEn (14) FEArs oF rECEssion using our iDEA, hypo vErEins BAnk hAs (15) An r-worD inDEx For gErmAny, Counting thE numBEr oF timEs thE worD rECEssion (16) in hAnDElsBlAtt.
worryingly, gErmAny’s r-Count For thE First quArtEr oF 2001 showED thE sEConD-stEEpEst (17) in thE pAst two DECADEs.But in thE sEConD quArtEr, thE inDEx DroppED By onE-thirD, (18) inAmEriCA (19) thE worlD EConomy hAs nothing to worry ABout, or journAlists ArE morE worDED ABout A (20) thAn A mErE rECEssion.
A、D-worD inDEx
A、But
B．yEt
C．howEvEr
D．Although