试题查看

首页 > MBA > 试题查看
【单选题】

Sustainable development is applied to just about everything from energy to clean water and economic growth, and as a result it has become difficult to question either the basic assumptions behind it or the way the concept is put to use. This is especially true in agriculture, where sustainable development is often taken as the sole measure of progress without a proper appreciation of historical and cultural perspectives.

To start with, it is important to remember that the nature of agriculture has changed markedly throughout history, and will continue to do so. Medieval agriculture in northernEurope fed, clothed and sheltered a predominantly rural society with a much lower population density than it is today. It had minimal effect on biodiversity, and any pollution it caused was typically localizeD、In terms of energy use and the nutrients(营养成分) captured in the product it was relatively inefficient.
Contrast this with farming since the start of the industrial revolution.Competition from overseas led farmers to specialize and increase yields. Throughout this period food became cheaper, safer and more reliable. However, these changes have also led to habitat (栖息地) loss and to diminishing biodiversity.
What’s more, demand for animal products in developing countries is growing so fast that meeting it will require an extra 300 million tons of grain a year by 2050. Yet the growth of cities and industry is reducing the amount of water available for agriculture in many regions.
All this means that agriculture in the 21st century will have to be very different from how it was in the 20th. This will require radical thinking. For example, we need to move away from the idea that traditional practices are inevitably more sustainable than new ones. We also need to abandon the notion that agriculture can be "zero impact". The key will be to abandon the rather simple and static measures of sustainability, which centre on the need to maintain production without increasing damage.
Instead we need a more dynamic interpretation, one that looks at the pros and cons(正反两方面) of all the various ways land is useD、There are many different ways to measure agricultural performance besides food yield: energy use, environmental costs, water purity, carbon footprint and biodiversity. It is clear, for example, that the carbon of transporting tomatoes from Spain to the UK is less than that of producing them in the UK with additional heating and lighting.But we do not know whether lower carbon footprints will always be better for biodiversity.
What is crucial is recognizing that sustainable agriculture is not just about sustainable food production.
What does the author think of traditional farming practices
A、They have remained the same over the centuries.
B、They have not kept pace with population growth.
C、They are not necessarily sustainable.
D、They are environmentally friendly.
查看答案解析

参考答案:

正在加载...

答案解析

正在加载...

如答案有误或试题有侵权,请联系我们。[提交反馈][在线客服]

根据网考网移动考试中心的统计,该试题:

6%的考友选择了A选项

11%的考友选择了B选项

82%的考友选择了C选项

1%的考友选择了D选项

你可能感兴趣的试题

CouldthebadolddaysofeconomicdeclinebeaboSomedayastrangerwillreadyoure-mailwithouWildBillDonovanwouldhavelovedtheInternetSustainabledevelopmentisappliedtojustabo[A]Whattodoasastudent[B]Variousdefinitio打印一页文件,甲出错的概率是0.04,乙出错的概率是0.05,从两人打印的文件中
版权所有网考网(netkao.com)All Rights Reserved

警告:系统检测到您的账号存在安全风险

抱歉,您的账号因涉嫌违反网考网购买须知被冻结。您可在“网考网” 微信公众号中的“官网服务”- "账号解封申请”申请解封。

微信扫描关注网考网