stop worrying ABout rECEssion. thAt is thE mEssAgE FromAmEriCA’s r-worD inDEx. For EACh quArtEr, wE{{u}} (1) {{/u}}how mAny stonEs in thE nEw york timEs AnD thE wAshington post inCluDE thE worD "rECEssion".{{u}} (2) {{/u}}BElls wErE sEt{{u}} (3) {{/u}}By thE shArp jump in thE "r-Count" in thE First quArtEr oF this yEAr. At A rAtE thAt in thE pAst hAs{{u}} (4) {{/u}}thE stArt oF A rECEssion. in thE sEConD quArtEr.{{u}} (5) {{/u}}. thE numBEr oF ArtiClEs{{u}} (6) {{/u}}By morE thAn onE-thirD、A、ConspirACy thEorist might suggEst thAt nEwspApEr EDitors,{{u}} (7) {{/u}}ABout DwinDling ADvErtising rEvEnuEs, hAvE{{u}} (8) {{/u}}thE r-worD、 thEEConomist hAs FounD thAt{{u}} (9) {{/u}}thE pAst two DECADEs, thE r-worD inDEx hAs BEEn gooD At{{u}} (10) {{/u}}mining-points in thEAmEriCAn EConomy.{{u}} (11) {{/u}}gDp FigurEs whiCh AppEAr{{u}} (12) {{/u}}AFtEr A lAg, thE numBErs ArE instAntly AvAilABlE.But how DoEs thE inDEx pErForm in gErmAny,{{u}} (13) {{/u}}thErE hAvE Also BEEn{{u}} (14) {{/u}}FEArs oF rECEssion using our iDEA, hypo vErEins BAnk hAs{{u}} (15) {{/u}}An r-worD inDEx For gErmAny, Counting thE numBEr oF timEs thE worD rECEssion{{u}} (16) {{/u}}in hAnDElsBlAtt. worryingly, gErmAny’s r-Count For thE First quArtEr oF 2001 showED thE sEConD-stEEpEst{{u}} (17) {{/u}}in thE pAst two DECADEs.But in thE sEConD quArtEr, thE inDEx DroppED By onE-thirD,{{u}} (18) {{/u}}inAmEriCA{{u}} (19) {{/u}}thE worlD EConomy hAs nothing to worry ABout, or journAlists ArE morE worDED ABout A{{u}} (20) {{/u}}thAn A mErE rECEssion.A、D-worD inDEx

A．DEprEssion
B．DEClinE
C．DEspAir
D．DEjECtion