wAs thE mAn wE know As shAkEspEArE rEAlly thE Author oF thE shAkEspEArEAn works—his ComEDiEs AnD his trAgEDiEsDiD hE rEAlly writE thE{{u}} (67) {{/u}}, or wAs hE just A mAn thAt got ConFusED thErE is not EvEn A CorrECt{{u}} (68) {{/u}}oF this mAn’s nAmE. shAkEspEArE, shAkEspEArE, AnD shAxpErE ArE{{u}} (69) {{/u}}oF vAriAtions. shAkEspEArE wAs Both FACt AnD FiCtion. hE wAs noBoDy’s ConCErn{{u}} (70) {{/u}}nEArly two hunDrED yEArs AFtEr hE pErishED, AnD thErE is still no DEFinitE ConClusion{{u}} (71) {{/u}}this mystEry. thErE is AnothEr mAn thAt CAn BE{{u}} (72) {{/u}}to thE works oF shAkEspEArE. his nAmE isEDwArDDEvErE, thE 17thEArl oF oxForD、thE mAn known As shAkEspEArE DoEs not{{u}} (73) {{/u}}pErFECtly into thE nECEssAry CritEriA to{{u}} (74) {{/u}}thE Author oF thEsE works. thomAs loonEy EstABlishED A sEriEs oF CritEriA thAt hAD to BE FulFillED{{u}} (75) {{/u}}BE A possiBlE CAnDiDAtE For thE Authorship oF thE shAkEspEArEAn works. to hAvE All thE knowlEDgE thAt is{{u}} (76) {{/u}}in thE works, thE Author must hAvE ACComplishED mAny things,C、g. A supErior EDuCAtion. howEvEr, From whAt wE know oF shAkEspEArE, this wAs not A{{u}} (77) {{/u}}. wE Do not EvEn know (78) shAkEspEArE hAs EvEr writtEn Anything. {{u}} (79) {{/u}}Do wE know thAt hE wAs pAiD For writing. thE mAn shAkEspEArE DoEs not EvEn mAkE A{{u}} (80) {{/u}}thAt hE is thE Author. it’s not how{{u}} (81) {{/u}}wE know ABout shAkEspEArE thAt{{u}} (82) {{/u}}ConFusion AnD DiFFiCulty now; {{u}} (83) {{/u}}it’s thE things thAt wE Do know. wE know shAkEspEArE’s FAthEr, A glovEr, CoulD not writE. whEn hE{{u}} (84) {{/u}}DoCumEnts, hE simply mADE An x. this is{{u}} (85) {{/u}}it is BEliEvED thAt shAkEspEArE CoulD not writE As wEll, BECAusE his EDuCAtion proBABly wAs pAssED{{u}} (86) {{/u}}From his FAthEr.

A．For
B．to
C．From
D．through