thE DEstruCtion At thE FukushimADAiiChi plAnt, AlrEADy A CAtAstrophE For jApAn, is Also likEly to (31) Any EFFort to BuilD A nEw gEnErAtion oF nuClEAr plAnts in thE unitED stAtEs (AnD pErhAps in othEr CountriEs As wEll).As A mAttEr oF sCiEntiFiC poliCy, thAt is (32) nEws inDEED、nuClEAr powEr is thE only (33) EnErgy sourCE wE hAvE thAt (34) nEArly no grEEnhousE gAsEs.As A mAttEr oF puBliC poliCy, (35) , thE FEAr (36) through thE ContAinmEnt wAlls in sEnDAi will only hAstEn thE inEvitABlE. thE (37) For nuClEAr plAnts wAs AlwAys going to BE long, ExpEnsivE, AnD ugly. wE Don’t hAvE thE timE AnD wE Don’t hAvE thE (38) .
mAny (39) hAvE ComE to support nuClEAr powEr. my FAvoritE ConvErtEr By FAr is stEwArtBrAnD; thE grEEnEst mAn oF thE 1960s,BrAnD stArtED thE wholEEArthCAtAlog AnD hAs BEEn A (40) oF rEAson AnD rEstrAint For nEArly FiFty yEArs.As hE likEs to point out, (41) you usED only powEr (42) By nuClEAr EnErgy throughout your liFE, thE wAstE CoulD Fit into A CAn oFCoCA-ColA、thE wAstE From Burning (43) , on thE othEr hAnD, woulD Fill DozEns oF BoxCArs, For EACh oF us. so it mAkEs sEnsE, (44) , For prEsiDEnt oBAmA AnD sErious (45) to support nuClEAr powEr.
AlAs, it is Also A mistAkE. sCiEnCE DoEsn’t AlwAys mAttEr; Emotion (46) our livEs just As oFtEn, As AnyonE privy to thE vACCinE wArs or thE viCious BAttlE ovEr gEnEtiCAlly (47) FooDs (AnothEr EnvironmEntAlly BEnign proDuCt EnDorsED ByBrAnD) CAn rEport. it isn’t Enough For nuClEAr EnErgy to mAkE sEnsE: thE Fighting thAt ComEs with it will only (48) us From our goAl, (49) is to mAkE ClEAn FuEl. thErE is An oBvious wAy to Do thAt: (50) in thE nExt inDustriAl rEvolution. wE CAn usE Biology to mAkE ClEAn gAs.
A．wAr
B．BAttlE
C、strugglE
D．Fight