| 在职攻硕英语易错题（2019/9/17） |
| 第1题：Every year, theAmerican LungAssociationALA、releases its annual report card on smog, and every year it gives an "F" to over half the nation’s counties and cities. WhenALA’s "State of theAir 2002" recently came out, dozens of credulous local journalists once again took the bait, ominously reporting that their corner of the nation received a failing grade. The national coverage was no better, repeating as factALA’s statement that it is "gravely concerned" about air quality, and neglecting to solicit the views of even one scientist with a differing view. Too bad, because this report card says a lot less about actual air quality than it does about the tactics and motives of theAL A、 The very fact that 60 percent of counties were giver an "F" seems to be alarmist. This is particularly true given that smog levels have been trending downward for several decades.According to theEnvironmental ProtectionAgencyEPA、statistics, ozone, the primary constituent of smog, progress will likely continue, even without the wave of new regulationsAL A、is now demanding. AL A、is correct that some areas still occasionally exceed the federal standard for ozone, but such spikes are far less frequent than in the past.Even LosAngeles, the undisputed smog capital ofAmerica, has cleaned up its act considerably. LosAngeles, which exceeded federal smog standards for 154 days in 1989, has had 75 percent fewer such spikes in recent years.But anALA-assigned "F" misleadingly implies that air quality has not improved at all. Most of the nation is currently in attainment with the current smog standard, and much of the rest is getting close. Nonetheless,AL A、chose to assign an "F" to entire county based on just a few readings above a strict newEP A、standard enacted in 1997 but not yet in force. In effect,AL A、demanded a standard even more stringent than the federal government’s, which allows some leeway for a few anomalously high readings in otherwise clean areas.AL A、further exaggerated the public-health hazard by grossly overstating the risks of these relatively minor and sporadic increases above the standarD、 The author draws on LosAngeles to prove that theAL A、______. A、is right to assign an "F" to that area B、often bases its report on the past events C、has a good reason to stress smog risks D、has overstated smog problems |
| 【单选题】： |
| 第2题： Protessor Wu traveled and lectured throughout the country to______education and professional skills so that women could enter the public world. A．prosecute B．acquire C．advocate D．proclaim |
| 【单选题】： |
| 第3题：Robert: Mary, I'd like you to meet my new neighbor, Tom. Mary: Hello, Tom. It's nice to meet you. Tom: ______ A．How is the baby B．Hello, Mary! I haven't seen you for ages. C．Hi, Mary! I've heard so much about you. D．Hi, Mary! Welcome to Chin |
| 【单选题】： |
| 第4题：After the guests left, she spent half an hour ______ the sitting-room. A．ordering B．arranging C．tidying up D．clearing away |
| 【单选题】： |
| 第5题：阅读下面一则材料，写一篇800字左右的议论文，谈谈你的看法。题目自拟。 我们的知识很有限，谁都愿意听听名人的指点，但这时就来了一个问题：听博识家的话好，还是听专门家的话好呢？解答似乎很容易：都好。自然都好；但我由历听了两家的种种指点以后，却觉得必须有相当的警戒。因为是：博识家的话多浅，专门家的话多悖的。 博识家的话多浅，意义自明，惟专门家的话多悖德事，还得加一点申说。他们的悖，来必悖在讲述他们的专门，是悖在倚专家之名，来论他所专门以外的事。社会上崇敬名人，于是以为名人的话就是名言，却忘记了他之所以得名是那一种学问或事业。名人被崇奉所诱惑，也忘记了自己之所以得名是那一种学问或事业，渐以为一切无不胜人，无所不谈，于是乎就悖起来了。其实，专门家除了他的专长之外，许多见识是往往不及博识家或常识者的。 ——节选自鲁迅《名人和名言》 |
| 【分析题】： |