在职申硕英语习题练习

在职申硕英语考试易错题(2019/7/31)
Many students find the experience of attending university lectures to be a confusing and frustrating experience. The lecturer speaks for one or two hours, perhaps{{U}} (61) {{/U}}the talk with slides, writing up important information on the blackboard,{{U}} (62) {{/U}}reading material and giving out{{U}} (63) {{/U}}The new student sees the other students continuously writing on notebooks and{{U}} (64) {{/U}}what to write. Very often the student leaves the lecture{{U}} (65) {{/U}}notes which do not catch the main points and{{U}} (66) {{/U}}become hard even for the students to understanD、
Most institutions provide courses which{{U}} (67) {{/U}}new students to develop the skills they need to be{{U}} (68) {{/U}}listeners and note-takers.{{U}} (69) {{/U}}these are unavailable, there are many useful study-skills guides which{{U}} (70) {{/U}}learners to practice these skills independently. In all cases it is important to{{U}} (71) {{/U}}the problem before actually starting your studies.
It is important to{{U}} (72) {{/U}}that most students have difficulty in acquiring the language skills{{U}} (73) {{/U}}in college study. One way of{{/U}} (74) {{/U}}these difficulties is to attend the language and study-skills classes which most institutions provide throughout the{{U}} (75) {{/U}}year.Another basic strategy is to find a study partner with whom it is possible to identify difficulties, exchange ideas and provide support.
1题:
A.extending
B.illustrating
C.performing
D.conducting
【单选题】:      
2题: The accepted criteria of adequate diet have been challenged by new discoveries in nutrition.
A.formations
B.components
C.standards
D.ingredients
【单选题】:      

3题:快要下雨了,还是早点回去为好。
【分析题】:

4题:The world is full of new horrors and there’s no place to hide. Who says soDisaster psychologists, for a start. They are the people who take in the big picture of our collective reactions to human-created disaster, the ways these reactions are caused, and our coping mechanisms.And research into disaster psychology is growing fast.
Among the big issues being addressed by these researchers are understanding the terrorists’ weapons, assessing the full impact of terrorism—and, crucially, working out which psychological approaches actually work. It’s a deeply controversial are
A、
Take the work ofDennisEmbry as an example. He argues that we have overlooked the obvious: the purpose of terrorism is to create terror. This works best "if the very symbols of everyday life become conditioned fear and anxiety stimulant". The top targets will be the most symbolic of a nation’s daily life, preferably served up for prime-time television.Crashing planes from United andAmericanAirlines into the Twin Towers and the Pentagon met those objectives all too perfectly.After the attacks, people stopped flying. Why Not because they had made a rational risk assessment but because the mere thought of flying made their palms sweat.
From terrorism to rail crashes, counseling and "debriefing" (盘问) are the standard response to help those caught up in disasters.But there are growing doubts about their effectiveness. What might be going wrongDebriefing focuses on getting people to talk through the trauma (损伤) and its emotional consequences soon after the incident.Could it be that some people are better by distancing themselves from what happened, rather than retelling it
If disaster psychologists want to find better ways to help, they’ll have to win the race between our understanding of human psychology and the terrorists’.
Why do people usually stop flying after terrorist attacks
A、Because they are terrified of flying.
Because they believe in rational risk assessment.
C.Because their palms will become too sweaty for them to fly.
D.Because they can’t decide which airline will be the safest.
【单选题】:      

If two scientists at LosAlamos National Laboratory are correct, People will still be driving gasoline-powered cars 50 years from now, giving out heat-trapping carbon dioxide into the atmosphere--and yet that carbon dioxide will not contribute to global warming. The scientists, F. Jeffrey Martin and William L. Kubic Jr., are proposing a concept, which they have patriotically named Green Freedom for removing carbon dioxide from the air and turning it back into gasoline.
The idea is simple.Air would be blown over a liquid solution which would absorb the carbon dioxide. The carbon dioxide would then be extracted and subjected to chemical reactions that would turn it into fuel.Although they have not yet built a fuel factory, or even a small prototype, the scientists say it is all based on existing technology. "Everything in the concept has been built, is operating or has a close cousin that is operating,"Dr. Martin saiD、The proposal does not violate any laws of physics, and other scientists have independently suggested similar ideas.
In the efforts to reduce humanity’s emissions of carbon dioxide, three solutions have been offered; hydrogen-powered cars, electric cars and biofuels.Biofuels are gasoline substitutes produced from plants like corn or sugar cane. Plants absorb carbon dioxide as they grow, but growing crops for fuel takes up wide strips of lanD、Hydrogen-powered cars emit no carbon dioxide, but producing hydrogen requires energy, and if that energy comes from coal-fired power plants, then the problem has not been solveD、The problem with electric cars is that they have typically been limited to a range of tens of miles as opposed to the hundreds of miles that can be driven on a tank of gas.
Gasoline, it turns out, is an almost ideal fuel (except that it produces carbon dioxide). If it can be made out of carbon dioxide in the air, the LosAlamos concept may mean there is little reason to switch, after all.
"It’s definitely worth pursuing," said Martin I. Hoffert, a professor of physics at New York University. "It has a couple of pieces to it that are interesting." Other scientists also said the proposal looked promising but could not evaluate it fully because the details had not been publisheD、
5题:{{B}}Passage Two{{/B}}
Which of the following can best describe the attitude of Martin I. Hoffert to the proposalA.Indifferent.
B.Positive.
C.Suspicious.
D.Critical.
【单选题】:      

 

您正在结束答题

请确认是否提交试卷?

继续做题 确认提交